Tom Lane wrote:
Nick Wellnhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The real cause of the problem seems to be a frontend/backend
communication problem. The "needed" argument 0x5454502b comes from a
4-byte length field which string content is 'TTP/'. Looks like a part of
a HTTP request to me.
Yeah, it k
Tom Lane wrote:
Sounds like you created all that stuff in template1, and so it's being
copied into the new database.
Yup, that's it. Thanks!
Rachel
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Peter,
> > I'd be the first to say that this aspect of the spec is a tad
> > bizarre. Does anyone want to argue for ignoring the spec and
> > implementing "saner" behavior? It's not like we are super close to
> > spec compliance for privileges otherwise ...
>
> My experience is that violati
Dear Peter,
> > Description:server includes not installed by default
>
> make install-all-headers
Good, but not enough?
I still argue that it should be done "by default", so that "extensions"
can be sure to find it. You cannot ask for the installer to reinstall if
s?he forgot it...
--
Dear Tom,
> I looked at this more carefully. In both SQL92 and SQL99, the only
> Access Rule for GRANT is
>
> 1) The applicable privileges shall include a privilege identifying
> O.
>
> Here "O" is the target object, and "applicable privileges" is all the
> privileges held b
Dear Peter,
> > > make install-all-headers
> > I still argue that it should be done "by default"
> I agree, but this is not a bug, it is a deliberate design decision.
Well, isn't feature just another name for bugs? ;-)
> If you want to change it, argue about it on -hackers.
Ok. Thanks.
--
Fa
Hello,
I think I have found a bug in postgresql:
When I construct a table with a check constraint with a regular expressions, it works
as expected.
But when I add a trigger to the table. The check does not work anymore in some
circumstances. It seems like the same check is influenced/ changed
