Craig Ruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, a note should probably be made in the documentation that for the
> moment, MIPSpro 7.4.1 should probably be avoided.
Appreciate the followup. Let us know if it emerges that the PG code is
doing something unportable. (It could be that the compiler is d
Ok, I have further information on this problem. I believe it is a compiler
problem. PostgreSQL version 7.3.3 is also affected when compiled with the
MIPSpro 7.4.1 compiler, but when compiled with MIPSpro 7.4 it is ok.
Using the gcc compiled version of backend/access/transam/xlog.c, I have
gotten
"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to install all from fresh with:
> ...
> But that dind't affect the groups or users. This was verified by running
> select from pg_group and pg_users immedately after total recreation.
Your trace shows no sign of having stopped the pos
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1051
Logged by: Jari Aalto
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4
Operating system: W2k SP4 / Cygwin
Description:Cannot remove groups
Details:
It is impossible to give details how this e
On 16 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream()
> > > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that
> > > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream()
> > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that
> > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len )
> > will always read len byte
