Re: [BUGS] data loss after vacuum

2004-01-11 Thread Tom Lane
Allan Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure if this is the right list to send this, but any help > would be appreciated. We recently encountered a problem running > postgres where, after a vacuum, all the data in one of our tables > was gone. Now, I guess technically we don't know for s

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1044: snprintf() shipped with PostgreSQL is not

2004-01-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Denis N. Stepanov wrote: > snprintf()/vsnprintf() functions are not ANSI-compliant Yes, they are. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1044: snprintf() shipped with PostgreSQL is not

2004-01-11 Thread Denis N. Stepanov
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: TL> "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TL> > Some OSes lack proper snprintf()/vsnprintf() fuctions so PostgreSQL includes TL> > its own version (src/port/snprintf.c) during building. Unfortunately, this TL> > version of snprintf() is not reentran

[BUGS] data loss after vacuum

2004-01-11 Thread Allan Tong
I'm not sure if this is the right list to send this, but any help would be appreciated. We recently encountered a problem running postgres where, after a vacuum, all the data in one of our tables was gone. Now, I guess technically we don't know for sure if it was indeed vacuum that caused the da