Re: [BUGS] CREATE INDEX spoils IndexScan planns

2003-10-31 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 12:25, Nitz wrote: > You were right, the volume of the data changes the optimizer's > willingness to use indexes. AFAICS, the optimizer seems to be making exactly the right guesses for the production data -- i.e. there's no problem/bug. > Another funny thing though... I ac

Re: [INTERFACES] [BUGS] pgtcl large object read/write corrupts binary data

2003-10-31 Thread Brett Schwarz
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [Using PostgreSQL-7.3.4 and -7.4beta5, Tcl-8.4.x.] > > Binary data written to a Large Object with > libpgtcl's pg_lo_write is > > corrupted. Tcl is mangling the data - something > to do with UTF-8 > > conversion. Examp

[BUGS] any windows port yet?

2003-10-31 Thread Optical Alert!
any windows port yet?

Re: [BUGS] CREATE INDEX spoils IndexScan planns

2003-10-31 Thread Nitz
Hi Rod, here is the actual production trace of the problem. This is a table of mobile network cells and code-names devided into LAC's. Two test cells to test with are: test cell id #1: 900 4900035 test cell id #2: 300 5080140 You were right, the volume of the data changes the optimizer's willingn

Re: [BUGS] CREATE INDEX spoils IndexScan planns

2003-10-31 Thread Rod Taylor
> TRACE: > The original tables are much bigger, so I've tried to simplify things here. > Please let me know if there is anything that I could help you with. You can't do that and expect to get reasonable results. The plans will change with the volume of data. Send an explain analyze of the true

[BUGS] CREATE INDEX spoils IndexScan planns

2003-10-31 Thread Nitz
Hi! SOME BACKGROUND: I am having a rather annoying problem which I have no explonation to so I am calling it a bug. Currenty I am designing a rather huge database with 700+ tables and unfortunately I am quite late to discover this as my test data is imported via \i the_whole_database_definition

Re: [BUGS] minor: ~ not resolved in psql

2003-10-31 Thread Francisco Olarte Sanz
On Thursday 30 October 2003 19:18, Bas Scheffers wrote: > > This is not a bug. If there is not file named ~ then it can't be > > opened. > I am not trying to open a file named ~, I am using it as part of a file > name, ie: ~/ewap/sql/ewap.sql. (where ~=/home/bas) This is perfectly valid > on any