Download current CVS and try that, or 7.4beta5.
---
ViSolve Open Source Team wrote:
> Subject: PostgreSQL Patch: Test-and-set routine for HP-UX (IA-64)
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch provides a test-and-set routine f
I am unable to get this patch to compile:
gcc version : gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020329 (experimental)
uname -srm : HP-UX B.11.22 ia64
tar xvf postgresql-7.3.4.tar
cd postgresql-7.3.4
patch -p0 ../PostgreSQL-7.3.4_hpux3_11iv2_IA-64.patch
./configure
[snip]
make
[snip]
gmake[4]: Entering directory
Subject: PostgreSQL Patch: Test-and-set routine for HP-UX (IA-64)
Hello,
The attached patch provides a test-and-set routine for PostgreSQL for HP-UX
11iV2 for the Intel Itanium architecture (known to the PostgreSQL code as
IA-64). There are actually two issues:
1. There is currently no tas (
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Wilmes wrote:
Nope, __solaris__ is not defined on our system either.
I thought our configure defined __portname__ for every platform, but I
don't see that anywhere, so it seems we rely on the compiler to supply
defines for the cpu and OS.
Does src/tools/ccsym show you
Nope, __solaris__ is not defined on our system either.
--Josh
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yikes! We thought we were already using ISM on Solaris.
Would you test the attached patch? It uses _solaris_ rather than
SHM_SHARE_MMU in the define test. Does that work too?
--
Josh Wilmes wrote:
> Nope, __solaris__ is not defined on our system either.
I thought our configure defined __portname__ for every platform, but I
don't see that anywhere, so it seems we rely on the compiler to supply
defines for the cpu and OS.
Does src/tools/ccsym show you your defines? I woul
Yikes! We thought we were already using ISM on Solaris.
Would you test the attached patch? It uses _solaris_ rather than
SHM_SHARE_MMU in the define test. Does that work too?
---
Josh Wilmes wrote:
> I hope this is the r
I hope this is the right place to send this.. the FAQ in the
distribution mentions http://www.PostgreSQL.org/bugs/bugs.php, which
doesn't work.
We've found that postgresql wasn't using ISM shared memory on solaris,
which theoretically would cost performance. The root cause in our case
was th
Hello,
Quoting Keith Marr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I recently installed 7.3.4 (complete install from scratch) and both 'select
>
> nextval('my_seq') from my_table' and 'select currval('my_seq') from my_table'
>
> return a number of rows equal to the number of rows in the table.
>
> The