Re: [BUGS] 7.4beta4: make check broken?

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Confirmed. Perhaps this should be looked into. On my system, "make check" > works fine if there is no existing PostgreSQL installation. But if there > is, we seem to prefer the existing installation's libraries over what > pg_regress sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to (the ne

Re: [BUGS] 7.4beta4: make check broken?

2003-10-06 Thread ljb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I got the same error with beta1, but the symbol was "get_progname" >> not "get_proname". Perhaps the above is a typo. > > "get_progname" would make sense, because that's a symbol defined in > libpgport in 7.4 that did not exist in 7.3.

Re: [BUGS] Domain Implicit Casting Trouble

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Hartwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I came across the following problem when migrating from 7.3.4 to 7.4b4. > Query #4 does not fail under version 7.3.4. But it does under version > 7.4b4. It seems that in some situations the implicit cast fails. Fixed in CVS tip. Thanks for the repor

[BUGS] Domain Implicit Casting Trouble

2003-10-06 Thread Dave Hartwig
I came across the following problem when migrating from 7.3.4 to 7.4b4. Query #4 does not fail under version 7.3.4. But it does under version 7.4b4. It seems that in some situations the implicit cast fails. It would not be a problem if I had the opportunity to manually cast these queries. But

Re: [BUGS] 7.4beta4: make check broken?

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got the same error with beta1, but the symbol was "get_progname" > not "get_proname". Perhaps the above is a typo. "get_progname" would make sense, because that's a symbol defined in libpgport in 7.4 that did not exist in 7.3. So if the dynamic linker was findi