Re: [BUGS] Vacuum going -D; crash or just impatience?

2003-07-16 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One thing I am puzzled by is the "D" status on the VACUUM process. Disk I/O wait state, no? Pretty much what I'd expect for VACUUM ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [BUGS] Vacuum going -D; crash or just impatience?

2003-07-16 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom, > I think it just needed more time. VACUUM goes to great lengths to be > crash-safe. I doubt that a "fast stop" could have left the database > in a corrupted state. OK, that's reasuring. I would have liked to give the process more time, but with users waiting One thing I am puzzle

Re: [BUGS] Vacuum going -D; crash or just impatience?

2003-07-16 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does this sound like a crash during VACUUM, or just like it needed more time? I think it just needed more time. VACUUM goes to great lengths to be crash-safe. I doubt that a "fast stop" could have left the database in a corrupted state. It is entirely l

[BUGS] Vacuum going -D; crash or just impatience?

2003-07-16 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, I've a 7.2.4 report-generation database that has been growing for some time, resuting in the nightly VACUUM FULL ANALYZE taking longer and longer. (most of the data is copied nightly from other systems, so use of FSM is not very effective). The problem is that the nightly admin scripts

Re: [BUGS] pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified table

2003-07-16 Thread Wehrle, Daniel
Hi Tom, where can i find the -n option in pg_dump. Is there any special version? I have 7.3.3. Regards, Daniel -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 15:44 An: Curt Sampson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [BUGS] pg_dump -t