Re: [BUGS] Bugs or Error?

2003-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Ninonard Policarpio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What i did is i install the postgresql 7.2.1mlx for libs, posgresql, and > server What in the world is "postgresql 7.2.1mlx" ? > "NOTICE: write error may be permanent: cannot write block 10 for 22892/1249 > ERROR: cannot write block 10 of 22892

Re: [BUGS] Bug #914: Possible bug with regards to multiple persistant connections

2003-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have a database with a single associated user account that owns the database. I > connect using a to this database and begin a transaction and start doing inserts and > updates. However, I want to commit some other data to the same database in a table > (unrelated

[BUGS] Bug #914: Possible bug with regards to multiple persistant connections

2003-03-19 Thread pgsql-bugs
Philippe Hajjar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Possible bug with regards to multiple persistant connections Long Description The operating environment in which this occurred is: Apache 1.3.27 PHP

Re: [BUGS] Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth

2003-03-19 Thread Ed Schaller
> Is this ready to be applied. It looks fine to me. I want to remove the > part of the patch that keeps the old structure definitions at the top, > but other than that, it looks good. Is there something that needs > improving about it? I've been working with it a little and it appears that somet

[BUGS] libpq PQexec not thread-safe

2003-03-19 Thread Chris Brown
Author note: I am not in any of the pg mailing lists. Please contact me directly for further information, or invite me to an appropriate mailing list. Summary: libpq PQexec is not thread safe with respec to the async signal handler SIGPIPE. This can result in problems ranging from an app signal h

Re: [BUGS] Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth

2003-03-19 Thread Ed Schaller
> OK, please let me know. Thanks. I haven't taken the time to check the current state of the authentication code and am relying on my old work on it. Would it be worth me taking the time to try to rework it in a better manner? >>>--> -- +-+---+--

[BUGS] ERROR: Invalid EUC_CN character sequence found (0x8000)

2003-03-19 Thread Leon Qiu
I met ERROR when I try to make a search using like 'Z%' with EUC_CN database. The next is the snapshot. Could any help me? Thanks.   palo=> \l    List of databases   Name    |  Owner   | Encoding  ---+--+--- palo  | palouser | EUC_CN   palo=> se

[BUGS] Bugs or Error?

2003-03-19 Thread Ninonard Policarpio
Hello, I just want to know if this is a bug or just an error to my postgrsql. What i did is i install the postgresql 7.2.1mlx for libs, posgresql, and server using Linux Red Hat 8.0. Then i created a "postgres" and do the following; su postgres psql template1 then i try to create database "in

[BUGS] Bug on solaris 8,

2003-03-19 Thread Michel Gallou
My conditions : Solaris 8, Postgresql 7.3.2, gcc 3.2 I try to compile with option 64 bits ( -m64 ) I obtain the error : make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/sources/pgsql/postgresql-7.3.2/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' gcc -shared -h libascii_and_mic.so.0 ascii_and_mi

Re: [BUGS] Problem with RULE to update tables

2003-03-19 Thread Sean Reifschneider
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:41:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Yup. A rule is invoked once per query, not once per operated-on record. >You'll find that a trigger acts more like what you are expecting. Ah, yeah, that seems to work exactly as expected. At least, my tests now pass successfully after c