Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Brian Macy
The config.log wasn't very useful but I hacked configure to not send compile/run errors to /dev/null and got this: checking whether long long int is 64 bits... ./conftest: relocation error: ./conftest: undefined symbol: __muldi3 Apparrently something is whacked when running from configure. I ca

Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Brian Macy
Yeah, weird... Steve Dunham narrowed the problem down to libssl and posted it to the debian-sparc list, Ben Collins, and appended the info to the postgres bug report. Hopefully it will be resolved for Debian unstable shortly. Brian Macy Tom Lane wrote: Brian Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Re: [BUGS] Bug #799: configure does not check for -lodbcinst

2002-10-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
> When configure is run with > ./configure --enable-odbc --with-unixodbc > it does not verify that -lodbcinst works. The absence of this > library (or misarranged symbolic links, etc.) is not detected > until relatively far into the build, when the ODBC driver is > actually compiled. Better,

Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Brian Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The config.log wasn't very useful but I hacked configure to not send > compile/run errors to /dev/null and got this: > checking whether long long int is 64 bits... ./conftest: relocation > error: ./conftest: undefined symbol: __muldi3 > Apparrently somet

Re: [BUGS] Bug #800: Bad free in function PQclear

2002-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I send a query with bad function. > The server answer me an error with text : ERROR: Function 'octet_length(unknown)' >does not exist > Unable to identify a function that satisfies the given argument types > You may need to add explicit typecasts. > Then,

Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Brian Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > checking whether long int is 64 bits... no > checking whether long long int is 64 bits... no Well, that seems to be the problem. Perhaps the relevant section of config.log would offer some hints? regards, tom lane

Re: [BUGS] Bug #801: now() in transaction

2002-10-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 07:23:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bhuvan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > now() in transaction > > Long Description > I am using 7.2.1. now() returns same value ever, w

[BUGS] Bug #801: now() in transaction

2002-10-18 Thread pgsql-bugs
Bhuvan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description now() in transaction Long Description I am using 7.2.1. now() returns same value ever, within transaction. If we use now() say 10 times in the same transaction, all 10 ti

[BUGS] Bug #800: Bad free in function PQclear

2002-10-18 Thread pgsql-bugs
Yvan Maillet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Bad free in function PQclear Long Description I use the libc library with the version 7.0.2-17. I send a query with bad function. The server answer me an error with

Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Brian Macy
./configure --with-openssl This fails to find a 64bit native type. Brian Macy Lamar Owen wrote: On Thursday 17 October 2002 09:28 pm, Tom Lane wrote: Brian Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Only excepts 32bit values and not 64bit. Endian issue? This is on sparc linux. Specifically Debia

[BUGS] Bug #799: configure does not check for -lodbcinst

2002-10-18 Thread pgsql-bugs
Steven Taschuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description configure does not check for -lodbcinst Long Description When configure is run with ./configure --enable-odbc --with-unixodbc it does not verify that -lodbcinst

Re: [BUGS] Pg 7.2.3 int8 value out of range

2002-10-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday 18 October 2002 12:27 am, Brian Macy wrote: > Apparently there is something wrong with the PGAC configure macro. > Though I'm not clear as to why it fails when there is not native 64bit > type in the compiler. At least I would think it would fail the create > table if it isn't going to su