Re: [BUGS] Multi-byte character bug

2002-07-30 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> By Chinese here, I mean BIG5 encoding character which is a widely used > encoding in HK and Taiwan. Ok. PostgreSQL does support BIG5 in the *frontend* side. > I've done a new check on it, I found JDBC and ODBC driver still report > the error message but psql do not (may be as you said, I've do

Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show /d+ /l+

2002-07-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am not sure how to do that. \? is already pretty full on the screen. Ideas? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Harald Armin Massa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more sever

Re: [BUGS] Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would love to know why doing this TODO item is so hard. Every time I > ask Jan, he says it is very hard and it never gets done. It doesn't look that hard to me, but I haven't tried yet ... regards, tom lane -

Re: [BUGS] Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser

2002-07-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I assume this completes the TODO item: > > o Fix PL/PgSQL to handle quoted mixed-case identifiers > > It would if it worked, but it doesn't --- for one thing, it seems > to allow empty identifiers (surely {DQUOTE}* should be

Re: [BUGS] Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I assume this completes the TODO item: > o Fix PL/PgSQL to handle quoted mixed-case identifiers It would if it worked, but it doesn't --- for one thing, it seems to allow empty identifiers (surely {DQUOTE}* should be {DQUOTE}+). I'm not convince

Re: [BUGS] Bug #724: Problmes creating aggregate functions in 7.2.1

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > create aggregate aggint4sum (basetype = int4, sfunc = int4_sum, stype = int4); This doesn't work because there's no int4_sum(int4, int4). regression=# \df int4_sum List of functions Result data type | Name | Argument data types --

Re: [BUGS] pg_ctl -w option does not behave as documented

2002-07-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
The pg_ctl code has this warning: # FIXME: This is horribly misconceived. # 1) If password authentication is set up, the connection will fail. # 2) If a virtual host is set up, the connection may fail. # 3) If network traffic filters are set up tight enou

Re: [BUGS] Patch for Re: [HACKERS] Bug of PL/pgSQL parser

2002-07-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
I assume this completes the TODO item: o Fix PL/PgSQL to handle quoted mixed-case identifiers It is quite a bit of lex code, but I assume it was required. No one else was able to fix this item. Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://can

[BUGS] Bug #724: Problmes creating aggregate functions in 7.2.1

2002-07-30 Thread pgsql-bugs
Dan Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Problmes creating aggregate functions in 7.2.1 Long Description I've included a short sample which shows what I'm having problems with. I using version 7.2.1 on Slack

Re: [BUGS] Multi-byte character bug (resend for clarify)

2002-07-30 Thread Richard So
>> Two bugs has been found in the SQL parser and Multibyte char support: >> >What is the encoding for "chinese char"? You need to give us more info. By Chinese here, I mean BIG5 encoding character which is a widely used encoding in HK and Taiwan. My setup: Db encoding: EUC_TW C

Re: [BUGS] Multi-byte character bug

2002-07-30 Thread Richard So
>> Two bugs has been found in the SQL parser and Multibyte char support: >> >What is the encoding for "chinese char"? You need to give us more >info. By Chinese here, I mean BIG5 encoding character which is a widely used encoding in HK and Taiwan. My setup: Db encoding: EUC_TW

Re: [BUGS] Bug #723: XlogFlush

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I would like to know what this message means, maybe a bug?? > ERROR: XLogFlush: request 0/6173A2D8 is not satisfied --- flushed only to 0/616E519C This suggests a corrupted LSN on some disk page, but without any context I can't say more than that. > This message is

[BUGS] Bug #723: XlogFlush

2002-07-30 Thread pgsql-bugs
Jose Soares ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description XlogFlush Long Description Hi all, I would like to know what this message means, maybe a bug?? psql> select * from capi; ERROR: XLogFlush: request 0/6173A2D8 is no