Re: [BUGS] views are not auto completed on psql

2002-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Jeff Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The best way that I can think to describe this is that views are not added >> as candidates of possible line completions in psql. > On my end, that doesn't seem to be the case (running a build of CVS > that is few

Re: [BUGS] views are not auto completed on psql

2002-05-27 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 24 May 2002 17:16:28 -0700 "Jeff Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The best way that I can think to describe this is that views are not added > as candidates of possible line completions in psql. > So if I have a view with the name org_details and a table with the name > organizations an

Re: [BUGS] Bug #676: lower(), upper(), & initcap() do not work on

2002-05-27 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> > lower/upper-casing is driven by locale, not encoding. > > > > Unfortunately you didn't mention anything about your locale setup... > > The server locale is en_US.UTF-8. (At least I set it up as such when > installing PostgreSQL; I know no way to verify.) The server version is 7.2.1, > runnin

[BUGS] problem with date cast

2002-05-27 Thread andrea gelmini
hi all, with latest cvs version of pg i've found this problem: ns:/tmp> createdb gino CREATE DATABASE ns:/tmp> psql gino Welcome to psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal. Type: \copyright for distribution terms \h for help with SQL commands \? for help on internal slas

[BUGS] PgLargeObject bug

2002-05-27 Thread Chris Traylor
see attachment. -- Chris Traylor If PostgreSQL failed to compile on your computer or you found a bug that is likely to be specific to one platform then please fill out this form and e-mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report any other bug, fill out the form below and e-mail it to [EMAIL PR

Re: [BUGS] Bug #676: lower(), upper(), & initcap() do not work on utf-8 chars

2002-05-27 Thread Henry House
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:56:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The string case manipulation functions lower(), upper(), & initcap() > > have no effect on non-ASCII characters in the argument, such as �, �, > > �, �, etc. ASCII chars in the argument are properly up- or

[BUGS] views are not auto completed on psql

2002-05-27 Thread Jeff Post
The best way that I can think to describe this is that views are not added as candidates of possible line completions in psql. So if I have a view with the name org_details and a table with the name organizations and I try select * from org the completion is organizations not a list of organizatio

Re: [BUGS] Bug #680: NOCREATETABLE

2002-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I saw a artiche what say that in 7.2 PostgreSQL version, the resource of create a >user with NOCREATETABLE was ready to use. I don't know where you saw that, but it has nothing to do with reality. regards, tom lane ---

[BUGS] Bug #680: NOCREATETABLE

2002-05-27 Thread pgsql-bugs
Marcia Abade ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description NOCREATETABLE Long Description I saw a artiche what say that in 7.2 PostgreSQL version, the resource of create a user with NOCREATETABLE was ready to use. I´m trying

Re: [BUGS] Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL

2002-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reading between a few lines I got the impression that the manual > suggested something like: > CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename%ROWTYPE ) RETURNS ... > When I finally got my function working, I found I had: > CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename ) RE

Re: [BUGS] pg_dump && aggregate bug

2002-05-27 Thread Mathieu Arnold
--On mardi 21 mai 2002 10:19 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> when I dump my database, in the dump file, the aggregate becomes : > >> CREATE AGGREGATE first ( BASETYPE = text, SFUNC = first_cat, STYPE = >> text, INITCOND = '' ); > > Ooop

[BUGS] Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL

2002-05-27 Thread Andrew McMillan
I recently referred to the manual (section 23.3) to work out how to write a PL/PgSQL function that accepted a row as a parameter. Reading between a few lines I got the impression that the manual suggested something like: CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename%ROWTYPE ) RETURNS ... When I finally g