[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I get a core dump when it try:
> begin; truncate table r;
> \df
Fixed in current sources. Thanks for the report.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive
Jean-Luc Lachance ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
core dump while \df in trasaction
Long Description
I get a core dump when it try:
begin; truncate table r;
\df
Also, I would be nice to have a different prompt
Okay. We're putting in plans to upgrade.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > spin lock aborts in 7.0.3
>
> I'm sorry, but there's not likely to be a lot of enthusiasm around here
> for investigating a problem report against a two-major-versions-back
> release.
Version:
7.3 devel, updated today, 7:00 am warsaw time.
Operating System:
Linux polpot 2.2.20 #1 Sun Mar 17 11:56:15 UTC 2002 i686
Pentium_III_(Coppermine)
Compiler and libraries:
$ ldd work/bin/postmaster | sed 's/^.* => //' | awk '{print $1}' | xargs ls -l
lrwxrwxrwx
Hi!
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 04:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Francisco Blay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> Incorrect result in math operation
>
> Long Description
> 3088.8 - (2847.64 + 241.
Francisco Blay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
Incorrect result in math operation
Long Description
3088.8 - (2847.64 + 241.16)=4.54747350886464e-13
It's spected to be 0.0 the result of this operation (I think)
G
