Re: [BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-14 Thread andrea gelmini
On ven, gen 11, 2002 at 03:16:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yes, I would like a copy of your script. i will package script and 'instructions' soon. i've got also two snapshots of db after the crash (tar files of postgres directory) > > I just found and fixed a problem that could lead to this kind

[BUGS] Driver Bug jdbc7.0-1.2.jar.

2002-01-14 Thread Roman Levandovsky
I have downloaded a driver for postgres to develop in java, the driver i downloaded is jdbc7.0-1.2.jar It works just fine untill i try to do something with the database from an event listener class. Then it blows up with a java null pointer exception. Everywhere else in the program i can read

Re: [BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-14 Thread andrea gelmini
On ven, gen 11, 2002 at 01:56:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yup, it looks like a bug to me. Apparently a CLOG segment has been > recycled too soon. We just found a bug of that ilk in sequence > processing, but VACUUM doesn't touch sequences, so apparently you have > a different bug. Please submit

Va: [BUGS] Bug #560: ODBC problem at migrating 7.0 to 7.1

2002-01-14 Thread Sandor Vig
Hello, I have the 6.50. ODBC driver. Sorry, can't send you any traces, becouse I've deleted all. :-( (I know, I know...) I could only send you the .exe file, (runs under W98/NT) and the actual database backup. The DB is only 2 tables, with max. 2000 records, but the .EXE is aprox. 30 MB, bec

Re: Va: [BUGS] Bug #560: ODBC problem at migrating 7.0 to 7.1

2002-01-14 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Sandor Vig wrote: > > Hello, > > I have the 6.50. ODBC driver. It's pretty old. Please try the latest driver at http://odbc.postgresql.org/. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://a

Re: [BUGS] cannot find attribute 1 of relation (of some user table) in 7.1.3

2002-01-14 Thread Dirk Lutzebaeck
Tom Lane writes: > Dirk Lutzebaeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, I have the follow problem when vacuum'ing on 7.1.3: > > ERROR: cannot find attribute 1 of relation docmatchsel > > Then I tried to reindex the table in standalone mode which gives: > > backend> reindex table docmatchsel