Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> This is probably overly restrictive; in fact, I would argue that there
>> should be no such check at all. We do not do runtime checks for
>> permissions on any other files, and some of them are far more sensitive
>> than postgresq
Tom Lane writes:
> A look at the source code shows it wants 744 or less.
>
> This is probably overly restrictive; in fact, I would argue that there
> should be no such check at all. We do not do runtime checks for
> permissions on any other files, and some of them are far more sensitive
> than p
