Re: [BUGS] comments on columns aren't displayed by \dd

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Psql manual pages says: > > > > The command form \d+ is identical, but any comments > > associated with the table columns are shown as > > well. > > Thank you for the response, Bruce. I was working fro

Re: [BUGS] comments on columns aren't displayed by \dd

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Psql manual pages says: The command form \d+ is identical, but any comments associated with the table columns are shown as well. > Stephen van Egmond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more severe it is

[BUGS] comments on columns aren't displayed by \dd

2001-03-19 Thread pgsql-bugs
Stephen van Egmond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description comments on columns aren't displayed by \dd Long Description Comments on columns appear to be broken. CREATE COMMENT ON COLUMN inserts stuff into the backend

Re: [BUGS] important decrease of performance using the BETA version in one particular case

2001-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Isabelle Therrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a big query, reported below, that is called several times in my > application. > At least 4 active connections call it at the same time. > Normally, this query is executed in about 30-50 milliseconds. > But after a while (depending on how m

[BUGS] important decrease of performance using the BETA version in oneparticular case

2001-03-19 Thread Isabelle Therrien
(sorry for previous HTML) Your name: Isabelle Therrien Your email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Configuration - Architecture : Intel Pentium Operating System : Linux PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL-7.1 Beta (but I u

Re: [BUGS] important decrease of performance using the 7.1 BETA version of PostgreSQL in one particular case

2001-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Isabelle Therrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Your >name   > :   Isabelle Therrien > Your email address  > :   [EMAIL PROTECTED] >   > System Configuration > - >   >Architecture  > : Intel Pentium >   Operating >System  > : Linux >

[BUGS] important decrease of performance using the 7.1 BETA version of PostgreSQL in one particular case

2001-03-19 Thread Isabelle Therrien
Your name   :   Isabelle Therrien Your email address  :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   System Configuration -   Architecture  : Intel Pentium   Operating System  : Linux   PostgreSQL version    : PostgreSQL-7.1 Beta (but I use JDBC drivers v7.0.2) I'

Re: [BUGS] Some regression tests are failed RH7.0

2001-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Can't tell a thing from that amount of detail. What's in >> regression.diffs? > It appears to be the locale deal, Tom. It hits a little too familiar of > a chord (and pattern). If we analyze his regression.diffs, we'll see > lots of c

Re: [BUGS] Some regression tests are failed RH7.0

2001-03-19 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Installing Postgress on a Red Hat 7.0 Server, some regression test > > failed (see below). How can i fix this failed queries? > Can't tell a thing from that amount of detail. What's in > regression.diffs? It appears to be the locale deal, Tom. It

Re: [BUGS] Some regression tests are failed RH7.0

2001-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Installing Postgress on a Red Hat 7.0 Server, some regression test > failed (see below). How can i fix this failed queries? Can't tell a thing from that amount of detail. What's in regression.diffs? regards, tom lane -

[BUGS] Some regression tests are failed RH7.0

2001-03-19 Thread pgsql-bugs
Martin Eichhorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description Some regression tests are failed RH7.0 Long Description Installing Postgress on a Red Hat 7.0 Server, some regression test failed (see below). How can i fix this

[BUGS] 7.03 JDBC drivers & large objects

2001-03-19 Thread Julian Richardson
Hi, this just cropped up on the Orion app-server list - someone there was having trouble storing large objects via JDBC in Postgres using the standard PreparedStatement.setBinaryStream() method. I tried the same test outside of Orion using a simple command-line app and hit the same problem. Pokin