Re: [BUGS] possible mis-handling of nulls in views in 7.0.2

2001-03-12 Thread Mark Stosberg
Tom, I tried to build a simple test case and I couldn't reproduce either. I'm still actively working with that database, though-- If I run into it again, and can reproduce a condensed case, I'll definitely submit it. It sounds like views are being improved a good deal in 7.1, so perhaps my oddi

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Depending on system install scripts (was Re: [BUGS] COBOL)

2001-03-12 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane writes: > > > I've suggested a couple of times that since we include install-sh in our > > distro anyway, it's pointless and unnecessarily risky to go looking for > > a platform-supplied install program. However, I could never quite get >

Re: [BUGS] possible mis-handling of nulls in views in 7.0.2

2001-03-12 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I'm running Postgres 7.0.2 and have run into a curious situation. I > got a back a null value in a select on VIEW that is defined as not > allowing that column to be null. I think this is an artifact of the curious (not to say broken) implementation

Re: [BUGS] pgDump sequence dump bug

2001-03-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Primoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I try to dump database with sequences which have "Uppercase" names it > dumps it like this: > CREATE SEQUENCE "Uppercase"; > CREATE TABLE "Table" ( > "ID" int4 not null default nextval('Uppercase':something), > ); This is fixed in 7.1. I don't think th

Re: [BUGS] referential integrity problem upon deletion and reinsertion

2001-03-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
This is a known problem. We don't have a fix yet. > Hi, > We think we have found a problem when deleting and inserting in > the same transaction with constraints deferred: > > > machine=> create table foo (bar int4 primary key, ref int4 references foo > deferrable

[BUGS] referential integrity problem upon deletion and reinsertion

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Barker
Hi, We think we have found a problem when deleting and inserting in the same transaction with constraints deferred: machine=> create table foo (bar int4 primary key, ref int4 references foo deferrable); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index

[BUGS] pgDump sequence dump bug

2001-03-12 Thread Primoz
I think there is a bug in pgDump.. If I try to dump database with sequences which have "Uppercase" names it dumps it like this: CREATE SEQUENCE "Uppercase"; CREATE TABLE "Table" ( "ID" int4 not null default nextval('Uppercase':something), ); And it do not work until I manualy change it to CRE

[BUGS] possible mis-handling of nulls in views in 7.0.2

2001-03-12 Thread Mark Stosberg
Hello, I'm running Postgres 7.0.2 and have run into a curious situation. I got a back a null value in a select on VIEW that is defined as not allowing that column to be null. Here's a screenshot: marvel=> \d shipments; View= shipments Query = SELECT "web_data"."shipment_id", "web_data"

Re: [BUGS] createStatement(int,int) of interface Statement not implemented

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 13:24 08/03/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Rahul Tyagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >createStatement(int,int) of interface Statement not implemented > >Long Description >createStatement(int,int) of

Re: [BUGS] absolute(int rownumber) method not implemented as per Sun guidlines

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 13:22 08/03/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Rahul Tyagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >absolute(int rownumber) method not implemented as per Sun guidlines > >Long Description >absolute(int rownumber)