Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [BUGS] no meaningful way to determine fe or be version?

2000-11-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
This concerns me. Did we lose a patch here? Can you send it again? > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > sorry, yes. the client-side interfaces (DatabaseMetaData.getDriver*) > > > are actually fine - they return a major/minor version that have been > > > getting manually updated (they're much more

Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [BUGS] no meaningful way to determine fe or be version?

2000-11-17 Thread Anders Bengtsson
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > sorry, yes. the client-side interfaces (DatabaseMetaData.getDriver*) > > are actually fine - they return a major/minor version that have been > > getting manually updated (they're much more visible, being in > > org/postgresql/Driver.java). the server-side interfaces

[BUGS] PostgreSql's making error in Windows NT4.0 Server

2000-11-17 Thread rugang
Dear Sir/Madam: According to Platform-specific FAQ's, I install PostgreSQL V7.0.3 in Windows NT4.0 Server. Before doing that, I installed cygwin and cygipc, they are the latest version. After running "ipc-daemon &", I run "./configure", it's OK! But when I run "make", there are several er