Re: [BUGS] pg_dumpall

2000-03-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:01:15AM +0100, Kardos, Dr. Andreas wrote: > Of course, Digital Unix is more important than QNX. For now I can live with > the solution to remove the escape backslashes from pg_dumpall. > But we should keep this problem in mind. Unix portable shell programming is > not a

Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update

2000-03-10 Thread Jerome Alet
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > What do you think? > > ... CENSORED :-) ... I will add it to the TODO. Aleluya (sp. ?) !!! At least you plan to do something, then I'm finally happy. When you'll correct this, and I hope it will be soon, please don't forget to correct the other b

Re: [BUGS] pg_dumpall

2000-03-10 Thread Kardos, Dr. Andreas
Of course, Digital Unix is more important than QNX. For now I can live with the solution to remove the escape backslashes from pg_dumpall. But we should keep this problem in mind. Unix portable shell programming is not a nice matter... Andreas Kardos -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter