Proposed patch for this bug in attached files.(See attached file: connection.cpp)(See attached file: connection.h)(See attached file: job.cpp)Tested against PG 9.1.4, all seems fine, success/failure reported correctly even when multiple jobs ran concurrently.Please test and feed back.Thanks.pgadmin
Hi
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Martin French
wrote:
> Proposed patch for this bug in attached files.
>
> (See attached file: connection.cpp)(See attached file: connection.h)(See
> attached file: job.cpp)
>
> Tested against PG 9.1.4, all seems fine, success/failure reported correctly
> even w
Apologies wrong files attached! It is Monday after all... ;o)(See attached file: connection.cpp.patch)(See attached file: connection.h.patch)(See attached file: job.cpp.patch)CheersDave Page wrote on 09/07/2012 10:16:47:> From: Dave Page > To: Martin French , > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org,
Tree Diff. diff -r pgAgent-3.2.1-Source pgAgent-3.2.2-Sourcediff -r pgAgent-3.2.1-Source/connection.cpp pgAgent-3.2.2-Source/connection.cpp28a29> lastStatus = 0;339a341> {340a343,344> conn->SetLastResult(0);> }344a349> co
I've got a script to update the schema on a number of servers. These
servers are at various versions of the schema, so I used the following
syntax for each function, not knowing if it needed to be created or merely
updated:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() .
But I get the error, "function
On 07/10/2012 04:28 AM, Steve Erickson wrote:
I've got a script to update the schema on a number of servers. These
servers are at various versions of the schema, so I used the following
syntax for each function, not knowing if it needed to be created or
merely updated:
CREATE OR REPLACE FU
