On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Otto Hirr wrote:
> FYI,
>
> The link for
>
> Page http://www.pgadmin.org/download/windows.php states:
>
> Note that the pgInstaller distribution of PostgreSQL
> for Windows includes a bundled copy of pgAdmin.
>
> where 'pgInstaller' is a link to a non-existent di
Does anyone know where the directory path for logging files comes from, under
"Options -> Logging"? I have a newly downloaded binary of pgadmin (1.12), that
defaults to an old user that does not exist on my machine. Any attempt to reset
the path with the browse command causes pgadmin to crash/qu
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Kirk Wythers wrote:
> Does anyone know where the directory path for logging files comes from, under
> "Options -> Logging"? I have a newly downloaded binary of pgadmin (1.12),
> that defaults to an old user that does not exist on my machine. Any attempt
> to res
Le 14/01/2011 00:27, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 14/01/2011 00:09, Ben Carbery a écrit :
>> [...]
>> I am using slony 2.06 on a pg 9.0.2 installation with pgadmin 12.2.2.
>> Whenever I click on certain elements of the object browser associated with
>> replication I get an error:
>>
>> ERROR: r
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 14/01/2011 00:27, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 14/01/2011 00:09, Ben Carbery a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>> I am using slony 2.06 on a pg 9.0.2 installation with pgadmin 12.2.2.
>>> Whenever I click on certain elements of the object brow
Le 19/01/2011 22:23, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 14/01/2011 00:27, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 14/01/2011 00:09, Ben Carbery a écrit :
[...]
I am using slony 2.06 on a pg 9.0.2 installation with pgadmin 12.2.2.
Whene
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 19/01/2011 22:23, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 14/01/2011 00:27, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Le 14/01/2011 00:09, Ben Carbery a écrit :
> [...]
> I am using sl
Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 19/01/2011 22:23, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
Le 14/01/2011 00:27, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 14/01/2011 00:09, Ben
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
>
>> Plus, it's just one of many replication engines.
>>
>
> This isn't a good reason to me. I would like to see something alike for SR.
My point is, why should we support one external replication
Le 19/01/2011 22:47, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>>> Plus, it's just one of many replication engines.
>>>
>>
>> This isn't a good reason to me. I would like to see something alike for SR.
>
> My p
Le 16/01/2011 09:32, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 15/01/2011 23:58, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>>> Nothing showstopping, but:
>>>
>>> 1) After you make changes in the Server Properties dialog, it gives you
>>> the fairly useless message that "
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 16/01/2011 09:32, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 15/01/2011 23:58, Josh Berkus a écrit :
Nothing showstopping, but:
1) After you make changes in the Server P
Le 19/01/2011 23:42, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 16/01/2011 09:32, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
Le 15/01/2011 23:58, Josh Berkus a écrit :
> Nothing showstopping, but:
>
Le 19/01/2011 23:51, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 19/01/2011 23:42, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 16/01/2011 09:32, Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 15/01/2011 23:58,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 19/01/2011 23:51, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 19/01/2011 23:42, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
Le 16/01/2011 09:32, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at
Le 20/01/2011 00:18, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 19/01/2011 23:51, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 19/01/2011 23:42, Dave Page a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 16/01/2011 09:32,
Le 16/01/2011 23:13, Josh Berkus a écrit :
> All,
>
> When I'm debugging stored procedures, I often will put lots of RAISE
> statements in them, sometimes generating hundreds to thousands of lines
> of output when I run them. pgAdmin is rather unhappy with this,
> dramatically slowing down as th
17 matches
Mail list logo
