sendet: Dienstag, 23. Mai 2017 15:18
An: Christoph Schreiber ; PgAdmin Support
Betreff: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
Christopher,
I am not PgAdmin support, but in all fairness
>You cannot make a pg_dump from a single column. You always have to dump the
>whole tabl
ag, 23. Mai 2017 15:42
An: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
Betreff: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
Hi Melvin,
sorry I meant to backup a single table (not a column) in a schema. This is
possible with pga3 and of course with the pgsql-console but not in pga4.
Regards, Chr
; PgAdmin Support
Betreff: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
Christopher,
I am not PgAdmin support, but in all fairness
>You cannot make a pg_dump from a single column. You always have to dump the
>whole table.
this has never been the case. pg_dump has never had the opt
entirely up to you.
www.youtube.com/unusedhero/videos
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
From: Christoph Schreiber
To: "pgadmin-support@postgresql.org"
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
#yiv096704961
connection problems seems to be fixed.
Regards, Christoph
Von: pgadmin-support-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgadmin-support-ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von Dave Page
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 22:43
An: Eric Hill
Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
Betreff: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me
I would have to admit to still having a fond regard for pgAdmin III - it was
fast and you could do things with it that you cannot yet do in pgAdmin 4.
However, as someone who has to manage a national database on a daily basis,
I am more than happy to work with the latest tools. Yes pgAdmin 4 d
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0400, Stephen Cook wrote:
> On 2017-05-19 16:07, Michael Shapiro wrote:
> > FWIW -- the final release of PgAdmin 3 fixed an ssl issue which, at
> > least for me, fixed the disconnects from the server.
>
> Not me. I still can't use it for more than a few minutes
On 2017-05-20 14:23, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 20/05/17 11:17, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
Y
On 20/05/17 11:17, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version t
On 2017-05-19 14:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version to use pgadmin III,
the newest release works f
Am 18.05.2017 um 22:43 schrieb Dave Page:
> Not to me, because the number of people I've had complimenting pgAdmin 4
> is probably 20x the number who have said they don't like it. Which is a
> good sign - normally people who don't like something are far more likely
> to say something.
People who
On 2017-05-19 16:07, Michael Shapiro wrote:
> FWIW -- the final release of PgAdmin 3 fixed an ssl issue which, at
> least for me, fixed the disconnects from the server.
Not me. I still can't use it for more than a few minutes at a time, or
with a query that returns more than a few dozen rows, if S
On 2017-05-19 6:30 AM, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than release
feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request You already
know it is missing...
Maybe this news for You but people used th
FWIW -- the final release of PgAdmin 3 fixed an ssl issue which, at least
for me, fixed the disconnects from the server.
t; postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michal Kozusznik
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 9:30 AM
> To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
>
> On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
> > You must understand one thing - first You stop developing
port-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgadmin-support-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michal Kozusznik
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 9:30 AM
To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
> You must understand one thing - first
> I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
I've been using pgAdmin III V1.22 without issue on PostgreSQL 9.6 on
several Windows OS's (7, 10, Server 2011, 2012).
I download every version of pgAdmin 4, have a look, and then c
On 19.5.2017 16:24, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 15:13, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.201
On 2017-05-19 15:13, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.2017 15:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.2017 15:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I serious
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version to use pgadmin III,
the newest release works fine with Postgres 9.6, and there is also the
Bi
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than release
feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request You already
know it is missing...
Maybe this news for You but people used this software for more than 10 years -
they got
One thing I’m doing is launching the software. pgAdmin III launches and
is ready to go in 3 seconds. pgAdmin 4 takes 20 seconds.
The other thing I’m doing is expanding nodes in the Browser tree. When
I expand the Ðatabases node under my server, pgAdmin 4 takes about 3.5
seconds to respond
> I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin III
until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version to use pgadmin III, the
newest release works fine with Postgres 9.6, and there is also the BigSQL
fork of pgadmin III which as far as I know
Ø Either way, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
This is something that a developer of software that people pay for would never
say, even if we sometimes think it, because we value our customers.
Ø You can't please everyone unfortunately but then a) it's free (despite being
estimated at ov
19 maja 2017 12:24 - "Dave Page" :
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tomek wrote:
>
>> You don't care what You users say about Your software??? That's a nice
>> statement...
>
> Twisting my words is a great way to make your point. Kudos.
>> Twisting... Saying "I'm not going to lose sleep ove
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tomek wrote:
>>> You don't care what You users say about Your software??? That's a nice
>>> statement...
>>
>> Twisting my words is a great way to make your point. Kudos.
>
> Twisting... Saying "I'm not going to lose sleep over it" means what - in case
> of some
19 maja 2017 10:04 - "Dave Page" :
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
>
>> 18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
>
> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
>> everyone that pgAdmin
>> 4 (
Am 19.05.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Dave Page:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
Hey,
I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
everyone that pgAdmin
4 (I have versio
On 2017-05-18 6:27 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
I have never heard of any other software program where
options/features from a previous release were not included in the newest
release.
Oh really? Excluding features/options when making major new versions happens
all the time.
Look at a lot of
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
> 18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious
>>> to everyone that pgAdmin
>>> 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody horre
18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
>> everyone that pgAdmin
>> 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody horrendous? It is absolutely as slow as
>> Christmas. It’s
os
> Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
> www.folkalley.com
>
> -------------
> FROM: Dave Page
> TO: Eric Hill
> CC: "pgadmin-support@postgresql.org"
> SENT: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:43 PM
> SUBJECT: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
May 18, 2017 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
#yiv3737576863 #yiv3737576863 -- _filtered #yiv3737576863 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4
6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv3737576863 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4
3
...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgadmin-support-ow...@postgresql.org] En nombre de rich...@xentu.com
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de mayo de 2017 05:15 p. m.
Para: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
Asunto: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
On 2017-05-18 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
pgAdmin 4 does get better with each release, and it's exciting to see the
folks from Pivotal prepping several major design contributions.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:15 PM, wrote:
> On 2017-05-18 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings or anything, but is i
On 2017-05-18 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
Hey,
I don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings or anything, but is it not
obvious to everyone that pgAdmin 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody
horrendous? It is absolutely as slow as Christmas. It's use of screen
real-estate is poor. I was never a huge fan of pgAd
> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
> everyone that pgAdmin 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody horrendous? It is
> absolutely as slow as Christmas. It’s use of screen real-estate is poor. I
38 matches
Mail list logo
