On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Bastiaan Olij wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think I speak for a number of people out there, seeing that over the
> past year I've received a few emails requesting for the patched version
> we have, that it would be nice if a new official release with the fixes
> from the
Hi Dave,
I think I speak for a number of people out there, seeing that over the
past year I've received a few emails requesting for the patched version
we have, that it would be nice if a new official release with the fixes
from the past year would see the light of day.
Cheers,
Bas
On 10/02/14
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> We're having the same issue as described in this post.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+OCxoxoCGc7d7tRdyC5-32dDMtXyT1m59s_Lk
> 3mohtxxfm...@mail.gmail.com
>
>
> It sounds from the post that this issue was fixed. Was this ch
We're having the same issue as described in this post.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+OCxoxoCGc7d7tRdyC5-32dDMtXyT1m59s_Lk
3mohtxxfm...@mail.gmail.com
It sounds from the post that this issue was fixed. Was this change ever
pushed to stack builder?
I was thinking maybe it wasn't since
[re-adding the list]
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Bastiaan Olij wrote:
> Hey Dave,
>
> As you've read from David's reply the job's status now comes back as
> successful which solves our immediate issue. I did a little more testing
> to see if I could get it to react to different exit codes an
Hi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Bastiaan Olij wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I don't think that will work, yes it will get the proper rc value but it
> still leaves succeeded set to false. It needs inclusion of a check to
> see if rc==0 and if so set succeeded to true provided that a successful
> scri
Hi Dave,
I don't think that will work, yes it will get the proper rc value but it
still leaves succeeded set to false. It needs inclusion of a check to
see if rc==0 and if so set succeeded to true provided that a successful
script indeed returns an error level of 0 (which I think it should).
And
Hi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Bastiaan Olij wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> First post on this list so I hope I'm doing things right.
> We've had a problem for awhile now that any batch script run by pgagent
> on windows gets the status failed even if the batch file runs just fine.
>
> I downloaded th
