Please keep messages on the mailing list.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Francisco Leovey wrote:
> OK PgAdmin was 1.12.2 when I did this install - I will try 1.12.3 then
>
> Could you give me a list of the required soft for PgAdmin to run on XP SP2?
>
> Thank you
>
>
There are no required pac
fair statement. I will stand corrected.
(but it does bother me that we have to guard against those things).
Doug Easterbrook
Arts Management Systems Ltd.
mailto:d...@artsman.com
http://www.artsman.com
Phone (403) 536-1205Fax (403) 536-1210
On May 2, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Piotr Czekalski wrote
Hello there,
Doug, I believe that some (at least if, not most of) PgAdmin users are
aware of software/OS construction problems and just require stuff works.
I don't defend MS but Linux apps also require libraries in order to make
some apps work correctly, fortunatelly solved by package managers
since this is a discussion list, I thought I'd weigh in with an opinion.
first, the visual C++ redistributable isn't really a PG admin problem, its a
Microsoft problem
second, why on earth would Microsoft distribute half an operating system ... or
an operating system without all its parts. as
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Francisco Leovey wrote:
> I installed a new XP SP2 workstation and to my surprise PgAdmin III 1.12.2
> (latest version) installs but will not run, gives weird error on start.
> (Yes, XP is still used by us. Mainly due to Mobo problems with W7).
> After a lot of
