Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
*From:* Donald Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 15 August 2003 00:51
*To:* [pgADMIN]
*Subject:* [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin III Reverse Engineered SQL
for RULES
Haven't checked the latest version.
Ru
Gosh,
didn't commit successfully, now it's conflicting.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 August 2003 11:49
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [pgADMIN]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin III Reverse Engineered
> SQL for RULES
>
>
> Um,
> did you notice that I alre
Donald Fraser wrote:
Haven't checked the latest version.
Running pgAdmin III 0.8.0 devel 3rd Aug.
Feature requests:
1)
The reverse engineered SQL code for RULES does not include the
*normal* commented out -- DROP RULE ...
Which I find very handy in most of the other reverse engineered SQL cod
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Donald Fraser
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 August 2003
00:51To: [pgADMIN]Subject: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin III
Reverse Engineered SQL for RULES
Haven't checked the latest version.
Running pgAdmin III 0.8.0 deve
Haven't checked the latest version.
Running pgAdmin III 0.8.0 devel 3rd
Aug.
Feature requests:
1)
The reverse engineered SQL code for RULES does not
include the *normal* commented out -- DROP RULE ...
Which I find very handy in most of the other
reverse engineered SQL code.
2)
RULES are
