Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-30 Thread Dave Page
No point - we're not going to release another 1.18 version. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > Thanks everybody for your contribution. > We've committed the patch in the master branch. > > Dave, > > Do we need to check-in this in the REL-1_18_0_PATCHES branch? > > -- > > Than

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-29 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Thanks everybody for your contribution. We've committed the patch in the master branch. Dave, Do we need to check-in this in the REL-1_18_0_PATCHES branch? -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company *http://www.linkedin.c

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-27 Thread Akshay Joshi
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Dave Page wrote: > >> Ashesh, can you review/commit this please? >> > Sure Dave. > I/Akshay will review the patch asap. > I have reviewed the patch and it looks good to me. > > > -- > > Thanks & Regard

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Ashesh, can you review/commit this please? > Sure Dave. I/Akshay will review the patch asap. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company *http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashes

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-27 Thread Dave Page
Ashesh, can you review/commit this please? On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Sanket Mehta wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I have reviewed the older patch, it looked good to me except one issue > that I have fixed. > I have attached the revised patch with this mail. > > > > Regards, > Sanket Mehta > Sr Soft

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-27 Thread Sanket Mehta
Hi Dave, I have reviewed the older patch, it looked good to me except one issue that I have fixed. I have attached the revised patch with this mail. Regards, Sanket Mehta Sr Software engineer Enterprisedb On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Akshay Joshi wrote: > Adding Sanket > > He has already

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-10-27 Thread Akshay Joshi
Adding Sanket He has already worked on it. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Ashesh Vashi < ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Sure > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Dave Page wrote: > >> Ashesh; can you review this please? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Dinesh

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-02-10 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Sure On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Ashesh; can you review this please? > > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Dinesh Kumar < > dinesh.ku...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dave/Team, >> >> I would like to take the owner ship of this patch from now onwards. >> >

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-02-10 Thread Dave Page
Ashesh; can you review this please? Thanks. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Dinesh Kumar wrote: > Hi Dave/Team, > > I would like to take the owner ship of this patch from now onwards. > > Sorry for my previous test case result, which is an improper one from my > side. I believe, i need to confi

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2014-02-07 Thread Dinesh Kumar
Hi Dave/Team, I would like to take the ownership of this patch from now onwards. Sorry for my previous test case result, which is an improper one from my side. I believe, i need to configure the same slony version on PG 9.2 as well. It seems an expected behaviour if the slony version is not match

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-12-10 Thread Dinesh Kumar
Hi Neel, On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Neel Patel wrote: > Hi Ashesh, > > Please find the updated patch with below fix. > > -- Fix for slony version 1.2.23 with PG 9.0 > -- Picking the correct version of slony1_base.xxx.sql > -- Fix the error "no schema has been selected to create in". It give

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-11-11 Thread Neel Patel
Hi Ashesh, Please find the updated patch with below fix. -- Fix for slony version 1.2.23 with PG 9.0 -- Picking the correct version of slony1_base.xxx.sql -- Fix the error "no schema has been selected to create in". It gives error after deleting the slony cluster and again create thenew slony

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-30 Thread Neel Patel
Hi, Thanks Ashesh. I will check and let you know. Thanks, Neel Patel On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > Hi Neel, > > I test the patch with following slony-I versions: > 1.2.27 (not working with PG 9.0) > 2.0.x(not picking correct slony1_base.xxx.sql - as per comment,

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-30 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Hi Neel, I test the patch with following slony-I versions: 1.2.27 (not working with PG 9.0) 2.0.x(not picking correct slony1_base.xxx.sql - as per comment, it should pick slony1_base.v84.sql with PG 8.4 and above, but picking slony1_base.v83.sql) I have not tested further. Can you please tak

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-29 Thread Dave Page
Ashesh, can you look at this one as well please? Thanks. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Neel Patel wrote: > Hi Dave, > > We have fixed the below two issues to support in Slony version 2.2.0 with PG > 9.3 in pgAdmin. > > Issue 1:- > > Bug to reproduce:- > > - Install PG 9.3 and slony 2.2.0 > - R

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-22 Thread demaseme
Hi, I'd be more than glad to test out, but how can I install the .patch file? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pgAdmin-1-18-0-slony-I-2-2-0-PG-9-3-tp5772774p5775445.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - pgadmin support mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-22 Thread Neel Patel
Hi Dave, We have fixed the below two issues to support in Slony version 2.2.0 with PG 9.3 in pgAdmin. Issue 1:- *Bug to reproduce:-* * * - Install PG 9.3 and slony 2.2.0 - Right click on database and click on option "New slony-I cluster..." - In the dialog we are able to see the error in status

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-11 Thread Neel Patel
Hi Sven, No idea regarding the next release. Thanks, Neel Patel On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Sven Meirsman wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the feedback. I'm looking forward to this update. Any idea on > when it will be released? > > regards, > Sven > > > 2013/10/11 Neel Patel > >> Hi Sven, >

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-10 Thread Sven Meirsman
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I'm looking forward to this update. Any idea on when it will be released? regards, Sven 2013/10/11 Neel Patel > Hi Sven, > > Sorry for the late replay, we have checked and it is a bug in pgAdmin > because the name of the sql files got changed in new slony version

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-10-10 Thread Neel Patel
Hi Sven, Sorry for the late replay, we have checked and it is a bug in pgAdmin because the name of the sql files got changed in new slony version ( v2.2.0 ) which is used by the pgAdmin. *Issue :- * * * When we install the slony ( version less than 2.2.0 ) then it will install below sql files in

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-09-29 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 22:29 +0200, Sven Meirsman wrote: > Sorry, My mistake. > > 'Binary Paths' is the section you choose at the left of the screen. It > contains several paths, one 'PG Bin Path' is directing to my postgres BIN > folder like you suggest. It is the Slony-I path that contains the pa

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-09-29 Thread Sven Meirsman
Sorry, My mistake. 'Binary Paths' is the section you choose at the left of the screen. It contains several paths, one 'PG Bin Path' is directing to my postgres BIN folder like you suggest. It is the Slony-I path that contains the path to the postgres SHARE folder where the slony scripts reside. S

Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-09-29 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 21:13 +0200, Sven Meirsman wrote: > Hello, > > I am having difficulties getting the slony-i scripts recognized and found > by pgAdmin, > > I am running > - Windows Server 2003. > - Postgres 9.3 + PostGIS 2.1.0 > - pgAdmin 1.18.0 > - slony-I 2.2.0 > > I installed slony-i 2.2

[pgadmin-support] pgAdmin 1.18.0 + slony-I 2.2.0 + PG 9.3

2013-09-29 Thread Sven Meirsman
Hello, I am having difficulties getting the slony-i scripts recognized and found by pgAdmin, I am running - Windows Server 2003. - Postgres 9.3 + PostGIS 2.1.0 - pgAdmin 1.18.0 - slony-I 2.2.0 I installed slony-i 2.2.0 using the Application Stack Builder. In Menu of pgAdmin, I have in File->Opt