Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Unfortunately this is not possible because PostgreSQL doesn't retain
the
original SQL entered (see the many discussions about this on the
pgsql-hackers list for details).
Yes, and I had quite some fights to get this pretty-print functions
into the backend for guys
Unfortunately this is not possible because PostgreSQL doesn't retain the
original SQL entered (see the many discussions about this on the
pgsql-hackers list for details).
Yes, and I had quite some fights to get this pretty-print functions into
the backend for guys like us that don't like dozens
I'm not sure what you mean here. Views don't have column defaults, only
the underlying relations do. How would you expect that to be expressed
in SQL (which pg_dump didn't do when I tried it btw)?
Not true, views can explicitly have defaults.
Chris
---(end of broadcast)
Dave Page wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 October 2003 14:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pgadmin-support] View column defaults in pgAdminIII
I recently installed pgAdmin III and am happy to see the
great work done by the
Forgot to CC the list...
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page
> Sent: 13 October 2003 15:49
> To: 'Donald Fraser'
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-support] View column defaults in pgAdminIII
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Donald
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] View column defaults in pgAdminIII
>> b) Include in the view definition DDL a
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 October 2003 14:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] View column defaults in pgAdminIII
>
> I recently installed pgAdmin III and am happy to see the
> gre
I recently installed pgAdmin III and am happy to see the great work done
by the team.
Thank you very much for so great a software tool!
Especially of interest to me are the facts that
1) the view definition DDL code is now presented with some CRLF's, i.e.,
more "pretty" than as in II, where it w
