On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:26 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:14 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 22:57 +, Kozusznik Michal wrote:
> > > > By query history, you mean the 4th tab in the query tool? or the
> > > > combobox?
> > >
> > > I meant th
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:14 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 22:57 +, Kozusznik Michal wrote:
> > > By query history, you mean the 4th tab in the query tool? or the
> > > combobox?
> >
> > I meant the combobox.
> >
>
> If you meant the combobox, it's a complete differe
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 22:57 +, Kozusznik Michal wrote:
> > By query history, you mean the 4th tab in the query tool? or the
> > combobox?
>
> I meant the combobox.
>
If you meant the combobox, it's a complete different story.
The combobox doesn't get the whole query. It gets truncated at 10
> By query history, you mean the 4th tab in the query tool? or the
> combobox?
I meant the combobox.
> Well, this would be a lot of work, something not reasonable to do. The
> probably hardest part of it would be to find individual queries; Good
> luck with that.
>
> Right now, we send to the s
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:15 +0200, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
> While trying to use query history, I found 2 issue limiting the power
> of this feature:
>
By query history, you mean the 4th tab in the query tool? or the
combobox?
> A)
> query history is filled by whole script, not only but queri
While trying to use query history, I found 2 issue limiting the power
of this feature:
A)
query history is filled by whole script, not only but queries run. It
fills query history by the same script multiple times even if script is
not changing.
How to reproduce:
1. Use following script
SEL
Le 21/09/2010 22:44, Thom Brown a écrit :
> On 21 September 2010 21:40, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Le 21/09/2010 22:05, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 21/09/2010 14:37, Thom Brown a écrit :
On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown
On 21 September 2010 21:40, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 21/09/2010 22:05, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 21/09/2010 14:37, Thom Brown a écrit :
>>> On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I think the q
Le 21/09/2010 14:37, Thom Brown a écrit :
> On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a
>>> tooltip. A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of t
On 21 September 2010 13:31, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a
>> tooltip. A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of the new
>> drop-down box with no indication as to
Le 21/09/2010 14:25, Thom Brown a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a
> tooltip. A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of the new
> drop-down box with no indication as to what this was. And to make
> matters worse, when he went to
Hi all,
I think the query history box should be labelled, or at least have a
tooltip. A colleague of mine was confused by the presence of the new
drop-down box with no indication as to what this was. And to make
matters worse, when he went to the help guide, the screenshot doesn't
show this drop
12 matches
Mail list logo
