Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-30 Thread Thomas Sondag
2006/5/30, Dave Page : > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Sondag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 May 2006 13:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > I'm not sure this is the better w

Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-30 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Sondag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 May 2006 13:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > I'm not sure this is the better way, because most of

Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-30 Thread Thomas Sondag
2006/5/29, Dave Page : > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Sondag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 May 2006 10:02 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > Hum, I miss this option ... sorry,

Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Sondag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 May 2006 10:02 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > Hum, I miss this option ... sorry, but the main diffe

Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-29 Thread Thomas Sondag
2006/5/24, Dave Page : > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Thomas Sondag > Sent: 24 May 2006 17:28 > To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > Hi, > > With P

Re: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-24 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Thomas Sondag > Sent: 24 May 2006 17:28 > To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs > > Hi, > > With PostgreSQL 8

[pgadmin-support] Proposed Patchs

2006-05-24 Thread Thomas Sondag
Hi, With PostgreSQL 8.1 and new ROLE object remplacing traditional USER/GROUP, I was a bit confuse using the dlgProperty and dlgSecurityProperty dialog because I can only select USER (ROLE with LOGIN privilege) for owner and GROUP (ROLE without LOGIN privilege) for privileges . And I not sure thi