Please keep messages on the mailing list.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Francisco Leovey wrote:
> OK PgAdmin was 1.12.2 when I did this install - I will try 1.12.3 then
>
> Could you give me a list of the required soft for PgAdmin to run on XP SP2?
>
> Thank you
>
>
There are no required pac
fair statement. I will stand corrected.
(but it does bother me that we have to guard against those things).
Doug Easterbrook
Arts Management Systems Ltd.
mailto:d...@artsman.com
http://www.artsman.com
Phone (403) 536-1205Fax (403) 536-1210
On May 2, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Piotr Czekalski wrote
Hello there,
Doug, I believe that some (at least if, not most of) PgAdmin users are
aware of software/OS construction problems and just require stuff works.
I don't defend MS but Linux apps also require libraries in order to make
some apps work correctly, fortunatelly solved by package managers
since this is a discussion list, I thought I'd weigh in with an opinion.
first, the visual C++ redistributable isn't really a PG admin problem, its a
Microsoft problem
second, why on earth would Microsoft distribute half an operating system ... or
an operating system without all its parts. as
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Francisco Leovey wrote:
> I installed a new XP SP2 workstation and to my surprise PgAdmin III 1.12.2
> (latest version) installs but will not run, gives weird error on start.
> (Yes, XP is still used by us. Mainly due to Mobo problems with W7).
> After a lot of
I installed a new XP SP2 workstation and to my surprise PgAdmin III 1.12.2
(latest version) installs but will not run, gives weird error on start.
(Yes, XP is still used by us. Mainly due to Mobo problems with W7).
After a lot of testing around I discovered that it needs Microsoft Visual C++
