On 2017-05-19 6:30 AM, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than release
feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request You already
know it is missing...
Maybe this news for You but people used th
FWIW -- the final release of PgAdmin 3 fixed an ssl issue which, at least
for me, fixed the disconnects from the server.
I think its a big improvement, but is still a little green. In a couple
more versions were all gonna love it.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Day, David wrote:
> Ditto to MK's comment.
>
> Developers can somewhat tolerate this "alpha" state in pgadmin4. I would
> never push/recommend pgadmi
Ditto to MK's comment.
Developers can somewhat tolerate this "alpha" state in pgadmin4. I would never
push/recommend pgadmin4 to our customers.
Someone indicated pg4 get 20 compliments for every negative, I would offer
there's 19 that simply decided it was not ready, and did not give your
> I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
I've been using pgAdmin III V1.22 without issue on PostgreSQL 9.6 on
several Windows OS's (7, 10, Server 2011, 2012).
I download every version of pgAdmin 4, have a look, and then c
On 19.5.2017 16:24, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 15:13, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.201
On 2017-05-19 15:13, Michal Kozusznik wrote:
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.2017 15:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-
It means you don't have to switch into pgAdmin4 just because you are
using recent version of database.
pgAdmin3 v1.22.2 supports pg9.6 (at least it doesn't throw exceptions
for common tasks)
MK
On 19.5.2017 15:45, rich...@xentu.com wrote:
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I serious
On 2017-05-19 14:20, Adam Brusselback wrote:
I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin
III until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version to use pgadmin III,
the newest release works fine with Postgres 9.6, and there is also the
Bi
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than release
feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request You already
know it is missing...
Maybe this news for You but people used this software for more than 10 years -
they got
One thing I’m doing is launching the software. pgAdmin III launches and
is ready to go in 3 seconds. pgAdmin 4 takes 20 seconds.
The other thing I’m doing is expanding nodes in the Browser tree. When
I expand the Ðatabases node under my server, pgAdmin 4 takes about 3.5
seconds to respond
> I seriously may go back to PostgreSQL 9.3 so that I can use pgAdmin III
until I can wean myself off the tool.
You don't have to revert your database version to use pgadmin III, the
newest release works fine with Postgres 9.6, and there is also the BigSQL
fork of pgadmin III which as far as I know
Ø Either way, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
This is something that a developer of software that people pay for would never
say, even if we sometimes think it, because we value our customers.
Ø You can't please everyone unfortunately but then a) it's free (despite being
estimated at ov
19 maja 2017 12:24 - "Dave Page" :
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tomek wrote:
>
>> You don't care what You users say about Your software??? That's a nice
>> statement...
>
> Twisting my words is a great way to make your point. Kudos.
>> Twisting... Saying "I'm not going to lose sleep ove
The pgAdmin Development Team are pleased to announce the release of
pgAdmin 4 version 1.5. This release of pgAdmin 4 includes over 20 bug
fixes and improvements:
Bug #2225: Object creation options are visible even if the object type is hidden
Bug #2253: Download as CSV often doesn't do anything
Bu
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tomek wrote:
>>> You don't care what You users say about Your software??? That's a nice
>>> statement...
>>
>> Twisting my words is a great way to make your point. Kudos.
>
> Twisting... Saying "I'm not going to lose sleep over it" means what - in case
> of some
19 maja 2017 10:04 - "Dave Page" :
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
>
>> 18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
>
> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
>> everyone that pgAdmin
>> 4 (
Am 19.05.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Dave Page:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
Hey,
I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to
everyone that pgAdmin
4 (I have versio
On 2017-05-18 6:27 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
I have never heard of any other software program where
options/features from a previous release were not included in the newest
release.
Oh really? Excluding features/options when making major new versions happens
all the time.
Look at a lot of
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Tomek wrote:
> 18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" :
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious
>>> to everyone that pgAdmin
>>> 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody horre
20 matches
Mail list logo
