I found the problem. There was a modified connection pooler in-between
that I had forgotten even existed... That appears to be problem for me.
Sorry to bother, Mea culpa .
..: Mark
On 11/17/10 10:47 AM, "Guillaume Lelarge" wrote:
>Le 17/11/2010 16:43, mark_sl...@mcafee.com a écrit :
>> H
Le 17/11/2010 16:43, mark_sl...@mcafee.com a écrit :
> Hi pgAdmin support list,
>
> I am using pgAdmin 1.12.1 on OSX to connected to a postgresql 9.0.1 instance
> that is the master in a SR++ROHS pair.
>
> pgAdmin sees the master as being in recovery mode and will of course disallow
> me to cre
Hi pgAdmin support list,
I am using pgAdmin 1.12.1 on OSX to connected to a postgresql 9.0.1 instance
that is the master in a SR++ROHS pair.
pgAdmin sees the master as being in recovery mode and will of course disallow
me to create new tables, insert records …etc. I am able to do all of these
On 17/11/2010 11:22, Dan Shoubridge wrote:
Dan,
Ok, I understand and it's a shame the vars aren't strong typed. It's
little things like that that make me want SQL Server back. It doesn't seem
like a big thing to some people, but for a lot of developers the amount of
work added by this when debug
>>Dan,
>> Ok, I understand and it's a shame the vars aren't strong typed. It's
little things like that that make me want SQL Server back. It doesn't seem
like a big thing to some people, but for a lot of developers the amount of
work added by this when debugging sql adds up over time.
>I know it'
Dan,
> Ok, I understand and it's a shame the vars aren't strong typed. It's
little things like that that make me want SQL Server back. It doesn't seem
like a big thing to some people, but for a lot of developers the amount of
> work added by this when debugging sql adds up over time.
I know it'
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Shoubridge
wrote:>
>
> Ok, I understand and it’s a shame the vars aren’t strong typed. It's little
> things like that that make me want SQL Server back. It doesn't seem like a
> big thing to some people, but for a lot of developers the amount of work
> added by
>Le 16/11/2010 23:26, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 16/11/2010 14:01, Dan Shoubridge a écrit :
>> Originally from SQL Server background, there is one feature that I
>> am missing and would save developers hours of time.
>>
>> In SQL Server I could copy sql code out of an applic
