> They're harmless, but I'll bet you're not using the latest point
> release of the 8.2 server. It shouldn't give out that message.
A new feature was added in 9.0, to be able to specify an application
name. Because people using the 9.0 client lib might have problems when
connecting to an earlier v
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Milan Jaroš wrote:
> I am getting following message in log
> /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-8.2-main.log:
> CEST FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "application_name"
>
> pgAdmin version: 1.12.1
> pgAdmin OS: Windows XP SP3
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2
> Post
Le 15/10/2010 09:45, Andreas a écrit :
> Am 14.10.2010 13:48, schrieb Guillaume Lelarge:
>>> I'm gonna work on it, unless someone wants to do it before :)
>> Done.
>
> :-)
>
>
>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>
> Suggestions are nothing when there is noone who actually does the hard
> work.
> Th
Am 14.10.2010 13:48, schrieb Guillaume Lelarge:
I'm gonna work on it, unless someone wants to do it before :)
Done.
:-)
Thanks for your suggestion.
Suggestions are nothing when there is noone who actually does the hard work.
Thanks for your commitment. :)
Will there be a 1.12.1 binary
I am getting following message in log
/var/log/postgresql/postgresql-8.2-main.log:
CEST FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "application_name"
pgAdmin version: 1.12.1
pgAdmin OS: Windows XP SP3
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
PostgreSQL OS: Debian 5.0.4
I have installed 1.10.5 too but it causes t
Sorry to re-open this thread, i'v just seen that my gdb output was wrong
(no symbols loaded because of a bad --prefix at compilation).
Here is the good output of gdb (on the last Git version of Pgadmin) :
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x083df5f0 in gqbView::updateModelSize
