Re: [pgadmin-support] Editing Views with EditGrid

2008-05-06 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Dave, Thank you for letting me know about the situation. Can you estimate how much work it would be to implement editable views? Maybe based on the experience with the editable tables? Maybe we can find a few interested parties paying for the development of this feature? Andreas Dave Pag

Re: [pgadmin-support] Potential issue with pgAgent when updating pga_jobsteplog

2008-05-06 Thread dpage
No, because pgadmin treats it as a system catalog. You'll need to use ALTER TABLE in the query tool. On 5/6/08, Benjamin Krajmalnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Via pgAdmin, going into the pgagent catalog, I do not have an option of > changing the column type to int4. > > > > -Original Message

Re: [pgadmin-support] Potential issue with pgAgent when updating pga_jobsteplog

2008-05-06 Thread Benjamin Krajmalnik
Via pgAdmin, going into the pgagent catalog, I do not have an option of changing the column type to int4. > -Original Message- > From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:57 AM > To: Benjamin Krajmalnik > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [pgadmin-support] Editing Views with EditGrid

2008-05-06 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > My understanding is that editing views with the EditGrid (similar to > editing tables) is currently unsupported. I would be very interested to > have this feature in an upcoming version of pgadmin3. I prepared

[pgadmin-support] Editing Views with EditGrid

2008-05-06 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi all, My understanding is that editing views with the EditGrid (similar to editing tables) is currently unsupported. I would be very interested to have this feature in an upcoming version of pgadmin3. I prepared some views and their corresponding insert/update/delete rules but can't edit the vie

Re: [pgadmin-support] Potential issue with pgAgent when updating pga_jobsteplog

2008-05-06 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Benjamin Krajmalnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe one of 2 things probably needs to be done: > > 1. Update the documentation to mention what range the result needs to be. > This means that queries which affect many rows need to be encapsulated in a > stor