Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There doesn't seem to be a -1 node in the sl_listen on the origin or
>> the subscriber.
>>
>> I've removed the second set that was still visible on the subscriber
>> from the sl_set table, however I'm still getting an event in the log
>> where it trie
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:07:27AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> >> > > I've had this happen before. Removing the cluster and setting it
> >> > up
> >> > > again resolves the problem, however once we are in a production
> >> > > environment I can't go dropping the whole cluster and replicating
On 15/01/2008, Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Unless you can make the sequence combo of any use (e.g. to change the
> >> default sequence used when creating the column) I'd say get rid of it!
> >
> > Thanks Andy. Any more opinions before I start pulling code?
> >
>
> Getting rid
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:55:12AM -0800, Glyn Astill wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> > > How do I remove this set from the subscriber?
> >
> > I think it's somehow scheduled up behind whatever that thing going
> > for
> > node -1 is looking. If you can get rid of that one from sl_listen,
> > I bet
> >
