Re: [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers

2007-11-19 Thread Erwin Brandstetter
On Nov 16, 2:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Lelarge) wrote: > Which means we will have to support two branches, REL-1_8_0_PATCHES and > trunk, till 7.4 is officially declared unsupported. If this is the case, > I'm ok with this. pgAdmin 1.8 will be there for older versions of pg, and it's no

Re: [pgadmin-support] dump shapefile

2007-11-19 Thread Willy-Bas Loos
> Willy-Bas; are you able to look at this? I'm not sure if any of the > regular developers would be interested or have time (I fall firmly into > the latter category right now). I'm not a C programmer myself, but I'll see what resources i can win for this case. It won't be very easy, so if you do h

Re: [pgadmin-support] dump shapefile

2007-11-19 Thread Dave Page
Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:00 +, Dave Page wrote: > >> I'm interested in supporting it, but if we're going to do it, we should >> do it properly. If there really is nothing needed but to allow dumping >> of shapes, then thats fine, but it doesn't seem like it would be

Re: [pgadmin-support] dump shapefile

2007-11-19 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:00 +, Dave Page wrote: > I'm interested in supporting it, but if we're going to do it, we should > do it properly. If there really is nothing needed but to allow dumping > of shapes, then thats fine, but it doesn't seem like it would be all > (and I don't know PostG