Hi,
My 2€: as long as the last version supporting PG 7.x is easily downloadable
from the web ... I don't think that till be a problem; for the users.
It's just for you guys (and the PG people), to know whether this is acceptable
considering pgAdmin is packaged with PG (Windows version).
In tha
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
next major version of pgAdmin?
Thoughts?
/D
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.or
Hi Gabriel, Guillaume,
I plan to upload something this week end.
Regards,
Raphaël
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Gabriel Giroux a écrit :
>> I'm using GNU/Linux Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon distribution on a Laptop where
>> PostgreSQL 8.2.5 has been isntalled.
>>
>> I'm a newbie on Gnu/Linux OS and I would
Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>> On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote:
>>> Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
>>> next major version of pgAdmin?
>> I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is off
On 16/11/2007 13:27, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be
supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version.
Ah - fair 'nuff. In that case, whatever makes the developers' lives
easier is grand by me... :-)
Ray.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote:
> >Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
> >next major version of pgAdmin?
>
> I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated.
Just to
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
what would that mean?
It´s all SQL, so what else is to be supported? Maybe shp2pgsql too? (i
don´t see why, pgAdmin supports output to file (CSV) now, but no
matching function backwards)
Or would it mean collaborating with uDig (run by refractions btw), to
provide a complete
My 2€cent: dropping suport for 7.x in pgAdmin would give a healthy
incentiv to update.
Harald
> Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
> next major version of pgAdmin?
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Magnus Hagander a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote:
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
next major version of pgAdmin?
I'd be agai
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>>> On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote:
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
next major version of pgAdmin?
>>> I'd be against dr
On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote:
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
next major version of pgAdmin?
I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated.
Ray.
---
Raymond O'Donne
what would that mean?
It´s all SQL, so what else is to be supported? Maybe shp2pgsql too? (i
don´t see why, pgAdmin supports output to file (CSV) now, but no
matching function backwards)
Or would it mean collaborating with uDig (run by refractions btw), to
provide a complete gis viewing experience?
12 matches
Mail list logo
