Hi.
From: "Luiz K. Matsumura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi, I download this snapshot, and detect a problem with query tool ( win XP pro)
The file open option is not working for me: I select the file but nothing is loaded from
the file.
I tested with the original 1.8.0 beta3 pgadmin.exe and it n
When viewing rows in a table, I was using a couple of different filters.
With the last line in the filter window commented out, the ordering specified
was not taken into account.
Stephen Denne
Disclaimer:
At the Datamail Group we value team commitment, respect, achievement, customer
focus, and
Hi, I download this snapshot, and detect a problem with query tool (
win XP pro)
The file open option is not working for me: I select the file but
nothing is loaded from the file.
I tested with the original 1.8.0 beta3 pgadmin.exe and it not load
files too.
Version 1.6.3 works fine.
TIA
Dave Page wrote:
Not really - it's generated from all the other bits of data. I updated
the .exe at http://developer.pgadmin.org/~dpage/pgadmin3.zip; try it out
and see what you think.
/D
Hi, I download this snapshot, and detect a problem with query tool ( win
XP pro)
The file open option i
Hello,
when the "View Filtered Rows..." modal dialog window is open, switching to
another application and back to pgAdmin will (seemingly) freeze pgAdmin.
You can reproduce this behaviour by:
* Start pgAdmin3 and some other programm
* Connect to a database and choose a table
* Select Tools -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
If any change via properties dialog would collapse the whole table
subtree that would be a change for the worse IMO. Then I'd rather have
the status quo ante.
Is there no way to just refresh the SQL pane?
Not really - it's generated fr
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> Also applies to views. (column defaults ...)
It works for them as well.
>> the only downside being
>> that it causes the child collection nodes to get recreated which causes
>> them to become collapsed. Not sure how to fix that without a fairly
>> large rewrite.
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
(...)
Concerning the issue at hand I am unsure what to look for. What Martin
addressed in his initial posting seems fixed in any case. Other things
might remain to be addressed.
For instance: add a new field per dialog.
-> field shows up in "
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> Hi Dave!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (...)
>> I've changed the behaviour somewhat so that's probably a little out of
>> date. There are undoubtedly some corner cases which would be a nightmare
>> to catch, but let's see if you pick anything up first.
>>
>
> I am
