Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Err, that check was added on purpose - part of libxml2 < 2.6.18 is
> broken. I added the code to acinclude.m4 to ensure we would only link
> with a library that works.
Hrm.
> Is RHEL really that far behind? 2.6.18 has been around for age
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 19/08/07, 11:40:34
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Redhat 4.0
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 08:44 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Which version should I try to get install
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 08:44 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > Which version should I try to get installed?
>
> I'd have said that one. What errors did you get? Devrim, should the FC
> RPMs work on RHEL?
No.
I (at last) built and uploaded RHEL 4 RPMs. They are on developer site;
will sync to main
