Title: Mensagem
Hi
:
Plataform :
windows XP SP2.
Language : Englihs
Installation
Binary, from windows installer ( Downloaded file pgadmin3-1.6.0-beta3.zip
)
Vercion :
1.6 Beta 3 ( Oct 12 2006, rev: 5475 )
Problem
:
I has a
table width 5 fields.
--
hd_tecnicosCREATE SEQUENCE
Hi developers! Hi Dave!
Testing RC2. Client Win XP, Server Debian Sarge, PostgreSQL 8.1.4.
I think I have found more issues in the edit grid, which have some
potential to damage things.
Sorry to bring this up so close to release. I did not find it any
earlier. Anyway, it is up to you what you
I will be asking this on the pgsql general list too but if lowercase is best,
I'll have to change some habits I've developed over the years, want to glean
whatever collective wisdom I can here from experienced pgsql devs.
I've been using namestyles with mixed case like OrgID. That is much more
re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
(...)
If I hit now, I end up with FALSE (!). That wouldn't be by
design, would it?
Probably not :-). I've committed a change which modifies the behaviour
such that simply clicking on the cell no longer cycles the value - it
now just displa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am using the actual Version (1.6 RC1) of pgAdmin III running on Windows XP
SP2 (fully patched) and think, I have found a bug:
I start pgAdmin, connect to a Database (PostgreSQL 8.1.5 on i686-pc-linux-gnu,
compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)), open the
Hello,
I am using the actual Version (1.6 RC1) of pgAdmin III running on Windows XP
SP2 (fully patched) and think, I have found a bug:
I start pgAdmin, connect to a Database (PostgreSQL 8.1.5 on i686-pc-linux-gnu,
compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)), open the query window and start
ty
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
Hi developers! Hi Dave!
Testing RC1. Client is Win XP. Server is Debian Sarge.
I have come across a peculiar effect while editing boolean fields. With
other fields, if you want to discard your changes while editing a field,
you hit and the original value is back (as
