Re: [pgadmin-support] [GENERAL] Building pgadmin on Fedora core 2

2004-06-23 Thread Andreas Pflug
Adam H. Pendleton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe Conway wrote: | Scot L. Harris wrote: | |> Running Fedora Core 2 trying to build pgadmin3 from source. |> |> Build wxWindows from sources. Appeared to build and install no problem. |> |> But when building pgadmin get the f

Re: [pgadmin-support] [GENERAL] Building pgadmin on Fedora core 2

2004-06-23 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
> I used the CVS HEAD code.  This was as of last week. Before everything, we should ask Andreas what he thinks about these fixes. We have been waiting for wx fixes for a year now, which is an infinite time in computing. By the way Adam, what is the state of the MacOsX wxFixMe port? Cheers, Je

Re: [pgadmin-support] [GENERAL] Building pgadmin on Fedora core 2

2004-06-23 Thread Adam H. Pendleton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scot L. Harris wrote: I took of pgsql-general, since this is largely a pgAdmin issue at this point. | I for one would much prefer a patch in the wxWindows code. I am | reluctant to start maintaining a different version of gtk+ just for this | applicati

Re: [pgadmin-support] [GENERAL] Building pgadmin on Fedora core 2

2004-06-23 Thread Scot L. Harris
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 09:56, Adam H. Pendleton wrote: > Would it be better for us to put a patch into our wxWindows tree for > this, rather than patching gtk? Do we really want to maintain a gtk > patch as well? Also, I've built pgAdmin3 on a fresh FC2 without having > to patch anything, which m

Re: [pgadmin-support] [GENERAL] Building pgadmin on Fedora core 2

2004-06-23 Thread Adam H. Pendleton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe Conway wrote: | Scot L. Harris wrote: | |> Running Fedora Core 2 trying to build pgadmin3 from source. |> |> Build wxWindows from sources. Appeared to build and install no problem. |> |> But when building pgadmin get the following error as it tries