Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Want a snapshot ? Have it :)
Hi Aurelien,
here is mine! :)
http://perso.club-internet.fr/blacknoz/pgadmin3/pga320031216shot.jpg
It looks ok. In fact I don't test sid in plain sid environment... My
display is a woody/testing
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Want a snapshot ? Have it :)
Hi Aurelien,
here is mine! :)
http://perso.club-internet.fr/blacknoz/pgadmin3/pga320031216shot.jpg
It looks ok. In fact I don't test sid in plain sid environment... My
display is a woody/testing mixed environment, but t
Le mar 16/12/2003 à 13:17, Aurélien Campéas a écrit :
> 2) when building a Table, the UI helping Foreign Key definition lacks
> the reference candidates list for the target table (RED color empty
> field in the second snapshot below).
>
> http://sigma.vm.bytemark.co.uk/pub/Members/aurelien/pgadmin
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Want a snapshot ? Have it :)
Congratulations
At the moment, I can't imagine what made that radio buttons disappear.
Please check if you have some bug nest right beside your processor, some
like it hot :-)
You can set the LogLevel in ~/.pgadmin3 to 3 or 4 with any
What would be the correct option in .pgadmin3 ?
LogLevel=SQL ?
Thanks,
Aurélien
FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #19 A: To be or not to
be. Q: What is the square root of 4b^2?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubs
Want a snapshot ? Have it :)
Le mar 16/12/2003 à 20:04, Andreas Pflug a écrit :
> Aurélien Campéas wrote:
>
> >Seems like 1.1 has the same problems.
> >Also, the log level is not selectable from the GUI (there's nothing to
> >click on, just a gray empty panel).
> >
> >
>
> ?!?!?
> Nothing to
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Seems like 1.1 has the same problems.
Also, the log level is not selectable from the GUI (there's nothing to
click on, just a gray empty panel).
?!?!?
Nothing to be seen from file/options?
Never heard something like that.
Regards,
Andreas
---(e
Seems like 1.1 has the same problems.
Also, the log level is not selectable from the GUI (there's nothing to
click on, just a gray empty panel).
I'm digging further...
Le mar 16/12/2003 à 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi Aurélien,
>
> todays debian snapshots have just finished to build a
Hi,
I admit that RH 7.1 is rather old, but it would be very painful to upgrade -
I think.
All right, I supppose I should use an old version of pgadmin if I use an old
version of opsystem. It seems to be obvious...
By the way WinXP version works fine so I do not have to miss the companion
of PGAdmi
Le mar 16/12/2003 à 14:16, Andreas Pflug a écrit :
> >1) key accel don't work when you have to select a type for a column. but
> >this is just a minor annoyance...
> >
> >
> What do you mean with "select type for a column"?
hmmm, to pick it from the list of types ?
> Try running the app with lo
Együd Csaba wrote:
Would anybody suggest me something to shortcut these annoying messages?
The problem here is that you are using a quite old version of RedHat;
the RPMs that we distribute are created for RH 9 and FC1. We've talked
about creating a 7.3 RPM, but we've never had a call for a
Hi,
I have many problems installing pgadmin3 on my RH 7.1 box. I get hundreds of
dependency errors and conflicts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPM]# rpm -i pgadmin3-1.1.0-cvs20031212.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libatk-1.0.so.0 is needed by pgadmin3-1.1.0-cvs20031212
libc.so.6(GLIBC_
Hi Aurélien,
todays debian snapshots have just finished to build and should be available as soon as
the mirror will be ok. These snapshots are built against our latest wx snapshot
(20031010-9) and should fix many functionnalities.
If you have further question regarding the build of debian packa
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Hello,
I'd like first to thank the guys that build pgAdmin 3 - it's a wonderful
tool !
Then, let's talk about some little problems. I first tried the win32
version under win2k and it worked just fine (backend on Debian Sid).
The debian/unstable version however has some pro
Hello,
I'd like first to thank the guys that build pgAdmin 3 - it's a wonderful
tool !
Then, let's talk about some little problems. I first tried the win32
version under win2k and it worked just fine (backend on Debian Sid).
The debian/unstable version however has some problems. It seems nobody
15 matches
Mail list logo
