Re: multiple Kerberos Server Principals from 1 instance of pgadmin

2019-08-16 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Ivan Novick (inov...@pivotal.io) wrote: > For greenplum database it would be gpadmin instead of postgres I see... I find that pretty odd- why would you change that? I suppose it's baked in at this point though, which is unfortunate. If it talks the PG protocol and is expected to b

Re: multiple Kerberos Server Principals from 1 instance of pgadmin

2019-08-16 Thread Ivan Novick
Hi Stephen, For greenplum database it would be gpadmin instead of postgres > > PGKRBSRVNAME is typically either 'postgres' or 'POSTGRES', depending on > if you are dealing with Active Directory clients or not. I agree that > it's theoretically possible that you might need to be able to configure

Re: multiple Kerberos Server Principals from 1 instance of pgadmin

2019-08-15 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Ivan Novick (inov...@pivotal.io) wrote: > We have a user that is working with postgres and greenplum and they said > that pgadmin4 only allows one Kerberos Server Principal per pgAdmin > instance because it takes the value of the environment variable > PGKRBSRVNAME. Kerberos Server Pr

multiple Kerberos Server Principals from 1 instance of pgadmin

2019-08-15 Thread Ivan Novick
We have a user that is working with postgres and greenplum and they said that pgadmin4 only allows one Kerberos Server Principal per pgAdmin instance because it takes the value of the environment variable PGKRBSRVNAME. Kerberos Server Principal value is the name of the user running Greenplum or Pos