Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> I think that this Gnome issue should be addressed after the release of
> 3.0. We should create a bug and see the best way to address it after. This
> is my proposal, because I am not 10
Hi Dave
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release that I
> think we need to resolve before moving forwards. For the time being, only
> patches critical to fix these issues should be committed.
>
> I'll try to look at 1,
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release that I
> think we need to resolve before moving forwards. For the time being, only
> patches critical to fix these issues should be committed.
>
> I'll try to look at 1
how do I resolve those errors in step 4 of the checklist?
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> This is my first time trying to make a Patch.
>
> I am using Ubuntu 17.10.
>
> This patch is in reference to the Feature Added by Dave Page
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/13
You need to make SERVER_MODE = False in config_local.py in order to run
feature tests.
--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> how do I resolve those errors in step 4 of the
All,
As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
support for the System Tray on which the new runtime relies.
They have rep
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release that I
>> think we need to resolve before moving forwards. For the
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Akshay Joshi wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release that I
>> think we need to resolve before moving forwards. For the time being, only
>> patches critical
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release t
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support for
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Neel Patel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
>> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
>> later. This is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rahul Soshte
Date: Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Little patch for Runtime build from Top Level
Directory($PGADMIN_SRC) MakeFile
To: Murtuza Zabuawala
I am still getting the same error even when I did SERVER_MODE = False.
On Thu, Mar 22,
Although I have postgresql-9.6 it is showing
--
--
Running the test cases for 'PostgreSQL 9.4'
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Rahul Soshte
> Date: Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Little patch for Runtime build
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support for
Although I have postgresql-9.6 it is showing-Running the test cases for
'PostgreSQL 9.4'
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> Although I have postgresql-9.6 it is showing
> --
> --
> Running the test cases for 'PostgreSQL 9.4'
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Rahul Soshte
Have you configured your local test configuration file
../pgadmin4/web/regression/test_config.json.in , Make a copy of it as
../pgadmin4/web/regression/test_config.json and update it as per your
environment to run tests.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> Although I have post
Enable building of the runtime from the top level Makefile. Fixes #1305
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=6d7f7952608b5bd07f20fa431ec540093f68d845
Author: Rahul Soshte
Modified Files
--
Makefile
Thanks - patch applied with a minor change of the target name
"runtime-release" to "runtime" (runtime-debug remains the same).
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> This is my first time trying to make a Patch.
>
> I am using Ubuntu 17.10.
>
> This patch is in reference to the F
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Akshay Joshi <
> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> We've run into a number of unexpected issues with the v3.0 release that
>
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Akshay Joshi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Akshay Joshi <
>> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>
there is a small typo in the target name "all" runtime-release needs to be
changed runtime too.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Thanks - patch applied with a minor change of the target name
> "runtime-release" to "runtime" (runtime-debug remains the same).
>
> On Thu, Mar 22,
Fix target dependency per Rahul Soshte.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=d5ebf6777a5470e4c39a5348bcf375534bd5e9c4
Modified Files
--
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Rats, my bad. Fixed now - thanks.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Rahul Soshte
wrote:
> there is a small typo in the target name "all" runtime-release needs to be
> changed runtime too.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Thanks - patch applied with a minor change of the
Hello Hackers,
Here is our take on the 3 options present:
1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
Pros:
- Webkit is a mature technology that as been around for some time
- Apparently the Fork of Webkit we were using as been catching up
Cons:
- We are using a Fork
- It is to far behind of the today browsers an
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
> 1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
>
> Pros:
> - Webkit is a mature technology that as been around for some time
> - Apparently the Fork of W
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
>
This looks like a good summary, so I'm going to pick this one to comment on
:)
> 1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
>
> Pros:
> - Webkit is
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Magnus Hagander
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Hello Hackers,
>> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
>>
>
> This looks like a good summary, so I'm going to pick this on
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Magnus Hagander
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Hackers,
>>> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> 2) Starting a second instance of the app bundle on Mac doesn't always
> open a new pgAdmin window as it should. It works fine in the debugger, or
> if you start the app with a command like: "/Applications/pgAdmin\
> 4.app/C
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> 2) This option is not very appealing to me, because we would be pilling
>>> code into the QT portion of the application, that I hope we remove in the
>>> future, that currently is untested to solve a problem caused by a Window
>>> Manager.
Hello Hackers
In the PoC we did with Electron last month this was the point where we
stopped
What did we accomplish:
- Use Electron as a runtime and packaging solution for the application
- Support opening new windows when the preferences ask for them
- Make the application generally work
- U
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) Starting a second instance of the app bundle on Mac doesn't always
>> open a new pgAdmin window as it should. It works fine in the debugger, or
>> if you start the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>> khushboo.va...@
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Sorry I did not understand what you said.
>> This configuration:
>>
>> DEFAULT_SERVER = '0.0.0.0'
>> SESSION_COOKIE_DOMAIN = DEFAULT_
36 matches
Mail list logo
