Looks good to me.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Adding to this - https://2022.stateofjs.com/en-US/libraries/testing/ here
> is what the usage says.
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
> aditya.toshni...@enterprised
Adding to this - https://2022.stateofjs.com/en-US/libraries/testing/ here
is what the usage says.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> I suggest we should replace jasmine+karma combination with jest for the
> following reas
Hi Hackers,
I suggest we should replace jasmine+karma combination with jest for the
following reasons:
1. Jest is a zero dependency, less config testing framework.
2. Has built in support for React. Easy to write React test cases. Jasmine
is more for Angular than React.
3. Jasmine requires enzyme
