Hi,
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:32 PM Akshay Joshi
wrote:
> Hi Murtuza
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:40 PM Murtuza Zabuawala <
> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are making assumption here that all user's service file has port &
>> username inside them.
>> What if they
Hi Murtuza
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:40 PM Murtuza Zabuawala <
murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are making assumption here that all user's service file has port &
> username inside them.
> What if they are not present?
>
5432 is the default port and the system user is
Hi,
We are making assumption here that all user's service file has port &
username inside them.
What if they are not present?
If I remember correctly those validation were left intentional when we
added service field just to make sure that we connect to DB server from
pgAdmin4 regardless of those
Looks good to me.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:05 AM Akshay Joshi
wrote:
> Can someone please review this.
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep, 2019, 18:06 Akshay Joshi,
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> Attached is the patch to fix the RM #4642 "port should not be mandatory
>> when a service is provided". *Cyril Jou
Can someone please review this.
On Mon, 9 Sep, 2019, 18:06 Akshay Joshi,
wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Attached is the patch to fix the RM #4642 "port should not be mandatory
> when a service is provided". *Cyril Jouve* has sent the initial patch,
> but that only removes the validation on GUI, when w
