On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Robert Emery
wrote:
> Hello Again,
>
> I've just tested the patch and the output is *much* more verbose with the
> same
> set of flags now, even more so than the old version (see attached).
>
Yes.
A many systems, pgAgent service starts before the database service
Hello Again,
I've just tested the patch and the output is *much* more verbose with the same
set of flags now, even more so than the old version (see attached).
Thanks,
Rob
On 11/06/2018, Ashesh Vashi wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Rob Emery
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ashesh,
>>
Hello Again,
I've just tested the patch and the output is *much* more verbose with the same
set of flags now, even more so than the old version (see attached).
Thanks,
Rob
On 11/06/2018, Ashesh Vashi wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Rob Emery
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ashesh,
>>
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Rob Emery
wrote:
> Hi Ashesh,
>
> Log-level wise I was using the same command for both versions:
>
> ./pgagent -f -l 2 -t 1 -r 1 'hostaddr=server user=username
> password=password dbname=postgres'
>
> and messing up the connection string in various way
Hi Ashesh,
Log-level wise I was using the same command for both versions:
./pgagent -f -l 2 -t 1 -r 1 'hostaddr=server user=username
password=password dbname=postgres'
and messing up the connection string in various ways (missing dbname,
incorrect password, incorrect hostaddr)
This was built a
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Ashesh Vashi wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Rob Emery
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I've been testing out PGAgent 4 (build today from master at commit
>> 86ca5c5ed1ad572075ba27e05e4680ebdf5b9feb) to check the connection
>> handling
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Rob Emery wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've been testing out PGAgent 4 (build today from master at commit
> 86ca5c5ed1ad572075ba27e05e4680ebdf5b9feb) to check the connection
> handling on error is still fixed with the boost reimplementation
> (which it is!)
> an
Hi Guys,
I've been testing out PGAgent 4 (build today from master at commit
86ca5c5ed1ad572075ba27e05e4680ebdf5b9feb) to check the connection
handling on error is still fixed with the boost reimplementation
(which it is!)
and noticed a few issues compared to PGAgent 3 around feedback to the
user i
