Thanks, the patch applied
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:12 PM Akshay Joshi
wrote:
> Isn't it possible to define it at a common location? These types of
> duplicate code are error-prone since sometimes we fix an issue at one place
> and forget to fix it at another.
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:56 A
Isn't it possible to define it at a common location? These types of
duplicate code are error-prone since sometimes we fix an issue at one place
and forget to fix it at another.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:56 AM Khushboo Vashi <
khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> One is for pgacloud standalo
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 03:52, Yogesh Mahajan <
yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patch looks fine. IP Addresses are prefixed by 32 and 128 for IPv4 and
> IPv6 respectively.
>
I hope you mean suffixed, not prefixed :-)
> Thanks,
> Yogesh Mahajan
> EnterpriseDB
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1
One is for pgacloud standalone code for background process and one for
pgadmin module.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, 10:11 Akshay Joshi,
wrote:
> Hi Khushboo
>
> Why there are two identical functions (def get_my_ip) in two different
> files, can you please make it generic in one place only and send the p
Hi Khushboo
Why there are two identical functions (def get_my_ip) in two different
files, can you please make it generic in one place only and send the patch.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:22 AM Yogesh Mahajan <
yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patch looks fine. IP Addresses are pre
Hi,
Patch looks fine. IP Addresses are prefixed by 32 and 128 for IPv4 and IPv6
respectively.
Thanks,
Yogesh Mahajan
EnterpriseDB
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:49 AM Khushboo Vashi <
khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the attached patch to fix the default Public IP range
Hi,
Please find the attached patch to fix the default Public IP range issue in
AWS deployment.
@Yogesh Mahajan , please test.
Thanks,
Khushboo
cloud_public_ip_fix.patch
Description: Binary data
