t it seems likely.
I remember looking into uwsgi (first choice) and there was some reason
it didn't work for this. Maybe it was just that Grant didn't recommend
it for this.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!
less-heavyweight webserver option than Apache HTTPD, mainly
for container-based deployment. I don't have a strong candidate for
this which is well-maintained upstream, though, because of the
single-process requirement. There's a bunch of simple-python
appservers, but none of them are well-packaged and maintained.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!
Project Atomic guys :-)
That's because docker hub is the "wild west" where people are willing to
hack whatever toghether whether or not it's maintainable or updated. For
the Fedora & CentOS projects, there's requirements that builds have to
be 100% reproduceable, which most of the time means RPMs. My goal was
to make pgadmin-for-web available officially on Fedora & CentOS, and
that's what I'm giving up on.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!
ommunity regard pgAdmin4 as not production
quality software.
As such, I'm done. When y'all decide to get real with caring about
users' ability to install pgadmin for web, ping me.
--Josh Berkus
