Re: Bug #6337 Patch

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:23 PM Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:22 PM Akshay Joshi < > akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Florian >> >> Following are the review comments: >> >>- The "MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS" parameter is not present in the *config.py*. >>It shoul

Re: Bug #6337 Patch

Hi On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:22 PM Akshay Joshi wrote: > Hi Florian > > Following are the review comments: > >- The "MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS" parameter is not present in the *config.py*. >It should be there with some default value maybe 3. >- Can be added like > >

Re: Bug #6337 Patch

Hi Florian Following are the review comments: - The "MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS" parameter is not present in the *config.py*. It should be there with some default value maybe 3. - Can be added like ## # MAX_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS w

Re: SQLAlchemy updates for check tables.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 9:58 AM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:17 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:37 AM Nikhil Mohite < >> nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hackers, >>> >>> Please find the attach

Re: SQLAlchemy updates for check tables.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:17 PM Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:37 AM Nikhil Mohite < > nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Hackers, >> >> Please find the attached patch for SQLAlchemy updates for check table is >> present in the database or not. (This will resolve

Re: SQLAlchemy updates for check tables.

Hi On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:37 AM Nikhil Mohite < nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > Please find the attached patch for SQLAlchemy updates for check table is > present in the database or not. (This will resolve load and dump server.) > How come this upstream change didn't

Re: SQLAlchemy updates for check tables.

Thanks, the patch applied. On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:45 AM Nikhil Mohite < nikhil.moh...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Akshay, > > PFA updated the patch to make it work with an older version of SQLAlchemy. > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:36 AM Akshay Joshi < > akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote

Re: [pgAdmin][RM6448]: [search object] error displayed for non superuser because of right on pg_catalog.pg_subscription

Thanks, the patch applied. On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:49 PM Pradip Parkale < pradip.park...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Akshay, > Please find the updated patch.I have added a more reliable solution to > solve this issue. > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:52 PM Akshay Joshi < > akshay.jo...@enterpri

pgAdmin 4 commit: Added exception handling for SQLAlchemy function to c

Added exception handling for SQLAlchemy function to check the table exists or not. Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=5768ade198bda653c7b20fc15574b8c8a8e6aceb Author: Nikhil Mohite Modified Files -- .../browser/tests

pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed an issue in the search object when searching in

Fixed an issue in the search object when searching in 'all types' or 'subscription' if the user doesn't have access to the subscription. Fixes #6448 Branch -- master Details --- https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2205fc6e178638dff9062e9b6c469c207b5e688 Autho

Re: [pgAdmin][RM6448]: [search object] error displayed for non superuser because of right on pg_catalog.pg_subscription

Hi Akshay, Please find the updated patch.I have added a more reliable solution to solve this issue. On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:52 PM Akshay Joshi wrote: > Thanks, the patch applied. > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:17 PM Pradip Parkale < > pradip.park...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Hackers, >>