I was thinking along the lines of...
String $foo = "hello";
$foo.scramble!
print "$foo\n";
$foo = "hello"
print $foo.scramble ~ "\n";
print $foo;
OUTPUT (or close):
elhlo
hloel
hello
Also, along these same things.. is there a way to apply a method to all
variables/objects of a certain type (e.g.
Please bare with me, I do follow this list, but sporadically.
What it all boils down to, obviously, is that we, as lazy programmers, want
to have to type less, but still leave the code make sense when read. So to
me, that should automatically throw out stuff such as C<$x = ( $foo § .a +
.b + .c )
gin
the adventure? Specifically, how it should be organized, among other
things.
Thanks :),
Matt Creenan
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
I sent this to BÁRTHÁZI only instead of BÁRTHÁZI and the list as well. So
here's a forward of what I sent and he replied to.
--- Forwarded message ---
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BÁRTHÁZI András" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: embedding langua
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:13:42 -0400, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heredocs are variants on q:to these days, but if you're going
to be mixing Perl and SQL syntax, it's probably better to dispense
with the heredoc and just have a language variant so that you can
parse it at compile time. A h
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:25:10 -0400, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt skribis 2005-04-22 21:55 (-0400):
What about . for each level up you want to go?
instead of 1.say, 2.say, 3.say
you use .say, ..say, ...say
(Ok, I'm just kidding.. really!)
I read your message after I suggest
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:24:25 -0400, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because a URI scheme ends in :. It http: followed by anything other than
// should fail because it is invalid, not fall back to file handling.
IFF you're handling URIs.
multi sub open ($u of Str where /^mailto:\/\//, [EMAI
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:31:03 -0400, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
given open 'mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' {
^say(...);
^close or fail;
}
That almost makes sense, given that $^a is like $_. It also points
vaguely
upward toward some antecedent. I could maybe get used
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:09:21 -0400, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt skribis 2005-04-22 14:44 (-0400):
mailto isn't something you can "open" really, for read at least.
No, but writing to it ought to simplify things :)
given open 'mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:42:10 -0400, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You speak of "open" as if it must be a single function. We're now
living in the age of MMD, so what you're asking for is a no-brainer.
If we decided to we could even do MMD with constraints:
multi sub open ($u of Str whe
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 03:32:12 -0400, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
3. Labels applies to blocks, not statements
Instead of this:
LABEL:
say "Hello!"
say "Hi!"
One has to write this (essentially creating named blocks):
LABEL: {
say "Hello!"
say "Hi!
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >3. It no longer has a unix specific flavour (PS I am not anti-unix in any
> >sense) so Mac, VMS and Windows users feel less confused.
>
> Did it get decided that we were *supposed* to make Unix and C programmers
> feel more confused and less at home
[I might join perl6-language some day, but until then, please CC me on all
Time::Object related messages]
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:14:22 +0100 (BST), Matt Sergeant wrote:
>I used to be a C programmer myself (well OK, I was a C++ programmer...),
>but I'd rather any day type "local
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Hildo Biersma wrote:
> >
> > I'd either leave that as (localtime)[3,4,5] (please read the man page for
> > Time::Object), or understand that there's absolutely no need to separate
> > off the variables like that in an object oriented interface:
>
> Ah, but we could make the
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >I'd either leave that as (localtime)[3,4,5] (please read the man page for
> >Time::Object), or understand that there's absolutely no need to separate
> >off the variables like that in an object oriented interface:
>
> > my ($day, $month, $year) =
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 01:44:28AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 11:07:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Basically, you don't want to go anywhere near this mess; it eats people.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > > I see two reasona
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> > While I think Time::Object is a really great module, and following these
> > discussions I'm thinking of adding a date() function to it
>
> Aaah! Please don't. :-) Name it something else, por favor (or at least
> wait until this is finalized and make t
ike consistency. =)
> What will be the Perl6 code name ?
> even the perl books has some animal to represent the main idea behind...
or
> just for the fun.
How about just "O'Reilly" for the code name? ;-)
Matt
Has anyone suggested "Oyster", or is that too obvious?
__
Matt Youell - "Think different, just like everyone else."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.youell.com/matt/
arily a string or a number. And what if I want to
treat a string-ifiable object as an untyped value? Is my var then "$
worthy"?
- Matt
Perl.
I abhor Hungarian notation. It's the dark side of Lazy. And chances are that
if you actually *need* it, your code needs some serious factoring, IMHO.
> My primary concern in this area is the introduction of forced verbosity.
Typing is good for you. It builds strong bodies 8 ways.
- Matt
l disengagements.
Yay! I guess I will take this moment to resuggest @^ as a list of
invocants and $^ =:= @^[0]. I like how the ^ kinda points you the
right way, also visually distinctive and doesn't get in the way of
$_...
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
till young, but would gladly take test cases.
<http://xrl.us/gqka>
Leo's Branch Meets PGE
After the initial discussion of optional parameter, Patrick updated the
leo_ctx5 branch of PGE to the new calling conventions. All tests pass.
<http://xrl.us/gqkb>
to say whether or not this is
confusing with adverb pairs, but I love the colon for private
methods/attributes and it's the one thing separating your new thinking
from my ideal Perl 6 OO.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
David~
On 25 Jul 2005 04:02:44 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to hijack this thread to discuss something else.
Speaking for summarizers everywhere. A! Damn you!
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Tu
vim.pl
Amir Karger noticed a bug in ops2vim.pl and suggested a fix. Jerry Gay
fixed it.
<http://xrl.us/gv62>
Leo's Ctx Branch Tests
Jerry Gay and Leo worked together to get his branch passing a few more
tests on windows. Nick Glencross wondered if the python dynclas
ar/[your ad here].
While we are talking about words... I dislike having Object encompass
Juction. I get the feeling that some people will write functions that
take Objects and not expect Junctions to slip in. I suppose that
could be one of those hurdles that developers just have to jump, but
it doesn't feel like it should be.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-02 through 2005-08-10
All~
Welcome to another summary, brought to you by chinese food. The
attentive among you will notice that this summary is a day late, because
I did not feel like doing it yesterday. If only I could do that at
work...
Perl 6 Co
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-15 through 2005-08-22
All~
Welcome to another monday summary, which hopefully provides some
evidence that mondays can get better. It always feels like writing
summaries is an uphill battle, perhaps I should switch to writing about
Perl 6 Language firs
All~
I have a simple question. Who comprises @Larry? I am fairly sure
that I know a few people in it, but I am highly doubtful that I know
all of them.
Thanks,
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-12 through 2005-09-19
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary, this time brought to you with a
shorter pause (::grumble:: $WORK ::grumble::) and assisted by cookies.
Perl 6 Compilers
Circular Preludes for Fun and Confusion
Yuval Kogman posted a reall
gh to warrant adding new syntax,
especially a syntax that conflicts with if .. else ..
It seems like add complexity for very little win (granted it is not a
lot of added complexity, but perl6 is already an very large language).
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
,> *not* called
foo .(1,2,3);# &infix:<,> *not* called
foo (1,2,3); # &infix:<,> called
foo( (1,2,3) ); # &infix:<,> called
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
with a special case that people will have to look out for later,
> and it hinders the usability of higher order functions by making
> it harder for them to accept the stringiciation operator, for
> instance.
>
> This lessens Perl 6 stability and
rules: optional stuff comes last.
I disagree, I think that is an easy call
for (1, 2) -> ?$prev, $cur, ?$next {
say "$prev -> $cur" if $prev;
say $cur;
say "$cur -> $next" if $next;
say "next";
}
should print
1
1 -> 2
next
1 -> 2
2
next
Ma
Austin~
On 9/29/05, Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> >Austin~
> >
> >On 9/29/05, Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Plus it's hard to talk about backwards. If you say
> >&g
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-26 through 2005-10-02
All~
Welcome to another summary, this time a day late because I was in Philly
for Serenity. If you haven't seen Serenity yet you should stop reading
this summary and go see it. The summary will be here when you get back.
I promis
really...
I have always wondered about the absence of these. CLOS has them and
they look quite useful. Was it an intentionaly decision to omit this
type of multi method?
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
rl.perl6.internals
=head3 Name Space is Dead; Long Live Namespace
Matt Diephouse announced the deprecation of get_name_space in favor of
get_namespace.
http://groups.google.com/group/perl.perl6.internals/browse_frm/thread/ddb3bba634077c8d/496252734de3c217#496252734de3c217
Google Groups : per
#x27;t valid formal parameters. We kind of need
> a subscript modifier instead:
>
> @array:[42] 42 => @array[1]
Same question.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
ts, but not how Perl does
> it. In other words: you should not want this.
How does that logically follow?
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-11-14 through 2005-11-21
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. The attentive among you may notice
that this one is on time. I am not sure how that happened, but we will
try and keep it up. On a complete side note, I think there should be a
Perl guild o
in Perl 6, XOR is spelled +^ or ~^, and ^ is Junctive one().
> So it seems that ^$x should be one($x). But that's an entirely
> useless, trivial junction, so it makes sense to steal the syntax for
> something else.
I think using C< ..5 > to mean (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) would be a more
Larry~
On 11/23/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:55:35AM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
> : I think using C< ..5 > to mean (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) would be a more
> : sensible option. Makes sense to me at least.
>
> That does
start writing weekly
summaries until you send me an email saying you are ready to resume.
Don't hurry on my account; I know moving is a pain.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-12-05 through 2005-12-12
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary. This week, like last, Parrot has
produced the highest volume of emails. Fine by me, Parrot tends to be
easiest to summarize. This summary is brought to you by Snow (the latest
soft toy in t
Perl 6 Summary for 2006-01-02 though 2006-01-09
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. On a complete tangent, if you are
playing World of Warcraft and see a troll hunter named Krynna, she
rocks. She royally saved me. Be nice to her.
Perl 6 Compiler
PIL Containers and Roles
ined behavior.
Could you provide a concrete example of the advantage of this approach
please? Failing that can you try and expand on your gut feeling a
bit?
Thanks,
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
ixote...
Perl 6 Compiler
Either this list followed its typical pattern of doing most of its work
off list, or google's indexing of it broke. I am guess the former and
continuing on blindly.
Perl 6 Internals
Unescapable Single Quotes in Strings
Matt Diephouse discovered tha
.".
Perhaps, I am just too firmly rooted in old paradigms but I think it
is very important not to conflate the representation of a thing with
the thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MagrittePipe.jpg
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
grammatically. What I don't really understand is what
exactly Pipe is and where it would be useful.
They way you have described Pipe feels a little muddy to me and I am
unsure about its purpose and semantics. Is it just an object I ask
`.can()` or does it have some deeper usefulness?
Matt
--
Stevan~
I am going to assume that you intended to reply to perl 6 language,
and thus will include your post in its entirety in my response.
On 2/7/06, Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Larry~
> >
> &
<http://xrl.us/jwuc>
Macros
Herbert Snorrason wants more specifics on macros in Perl 6. Larry gave
him some.
<http://xrl.us/jwud>
Synopsis Typos
Yiyi Hu and Andrew Savige found a few typos in a few synopses. Larry
graciously fixed them.
<http://
fact( Int $n ) { return $n * fact($n-1); }
Why not have class methods take the form
class Foo {
method foo (Class Foo) {
say "I am a class method, and proud of it";
}
}
They are still well types (I think), and properly restricts the types
allowed for foo. After all Foo is just a specific instance of the
class Class.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
ll
> have forgotten all about class Class.
>
> 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... *snap*
... What!?!? Where was I? Oh, yeah. As I was saying, I think we
just take C++'s object system exactly.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
.foo()> was a method call on C<$a>.
Thanks,
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
Larry~
On 4/6/06, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:58:55PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> : All~
> :
> : I just noticed something claiming that C<$a. foo()> is actually
> : C<$a.foo()> (a method call on C<$a>) and that C
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_ordering
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
n config file
+ extended support for gcc, icc, and other compilers
+ extended support for Solaris and other platforms
Thanks to all our contributors for making this possible, and our
sponsors for supporting this project.
Enjoy!
--
Matt Diephouse
It just goes to show.. the perl community has already thought of
everything..
-Original Message-
From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:41 PM
To: Carissa
Cc: Perl Language
Subject: Re: Operators that keep going and going...
Carissa writes:
> The oth
one could define
easily. Of course, I have no idea how to reconcile this with all the
talk of unicode other than to say that the easy stuff should be easy.
It just follows this would also be nice for arrays, to replace splice.
For me, these two functions are the most bothersome part of Perl 5, and
I would love to see them go.
matt
Juerd wrote:
Matt Diephouse skribis 2004-06-30 20:51 (-0400):
my $string = "Hello, World!";
say $string[0..4]; # prints "Hello\n"
$string[7...] = "Larry!";
say $string; # prints "Hello, Larry!\n"
And that "array" is one of bytes? graphemes?
I&#x
an about this a few weeks ago. He said
whetever they could get away with would be valid. Meaning that as long
as it is doable with the parser you can do it.
matt
This is close to the new form() syntax as well, which could be
considered a plus. I for one won't complain about adding the good things
from Ruby back in to Perl.
matt
Note that this not only fixes the Perl 6 "% in sprintf" issue, but
also the Perl 5 "@ in email address&qu
@array.each:{$^odd.bar() }:{ $^even.baz() };
Admittedly it's a much smaller case, but it should be useful, even if
I can't think of a non trivial case offhand.
--
matt diephouse
--
http://matt.diephouse.com
>
> Larry
>
.;
}
my $odd = odd_numbers :by(2);
Does that pass C 2> as a Pair to the function? Or does it apply
the adverb to the result? Maybe I need to do this?
my $odd = (odd_numbers) :by(2);
My head is swimming at this point, so I'd better give it a rest.
matt
> On the other hand, the par
is will work
differently in Perl 6? I'd be tempted to suggest that C<<=>>>, in its
new role as pair constructor, put things in scalar context, but lately
I've started to write join's like so:
my $string = join "," => @array;
I want my cake. And I want to eat it to, dang it!
--
matt
... }
Or maybe one method could be used both ways, depending on whether it's
called in list or scalar context. But you wouldn't get the implicit
assignment to C<$_>.
--
matt
quot; => @array;
>
> my $string = join "," <== @array;
>
> It's a 180, but it'll workforme.
I think I'm going to go with C< @array.join(",") >. :)
--
matt
>
> Juerd
--or--
for @a ¥ @b <-> { ... }
?
--
matt
introduced a new feature midthink
(and I'd missed it).
--
matt
I've always thought that particular bit of sugar was rather dangerous. I'd
even prefer a longhand:
$foo either 0 or split();
to the troublesome double-usage of C<::>
I think I'd prefer that as well, since it has the advantage of not having to
use the evil shift key. Though i don't think it s
I think I'd prefer that as well, since it has the advantage of not having
to use the evil shift key. Though i don't think it stands out as much as
it should.
I hate to reply to my own message, but...
How about
$foo??split()!!0;
for a touch of craziness. Or is !! not usable? Actually, just igno
me? 1st should mean the first element.
-1st should mean the first element of the reversed array.
Don't say -1st is the "first from last". If last is the opposite of
first, I would expect 1st to mean "first from first," which would mean
the second. Say "first from the end".
--
matt
I may be completely off base here, but I think this whole discussion
would be better suited for perl6-internals. A packaging system would
not be a feature of the language itself, but of its implementation.
Don't confuse Perl and perl.
--
matt
is parrot).
perl6-language is about Perl the language.
perl != Perl
Code packaging is a matter of perl, not Perl, I believe.
--
matt
@$input = pack pop(@$templates), @$input;
return @$input if not @$templates;
# special goto magic for tail recursion
@_ = ($input, $templates);
goto &extended_pack_rec;
}
I prefer Perl 6.
--
matt
All~
I am willing to try and take on this responsibility. I have been
reading p6i for several years now and always appreciated the summary,
so what better way to give back.
Any advice/scripts that Piers (or anyone else) can provide me would be
appreciated.
Matt
--
"Computer Science is m
docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod, and the fact that it should be applied
to perl code where appropriate. Thank you.
= rx_compile and FSAs
Aaron Sherman has some ambitious stuff in the works with respect to
regular expressions. Stay tuned for details.
http://xrl.us/dixx
= Single character from stdi
.us/dndf>
Parrot Forth
Michel Pelletier and Matt Diephouse discussed some of the finer points
of Forth implementations and optimizations.
<http://xrl.us/dndg>
Win32 update
Ron Blaschke gave a quick update on his progress with VC7.1 on Win32.
Looks good an
erting
everything to dynclasses. He and Leo talked out some alternatives.
Things are looking promising.
<http://xrl.us/drte>
threading issues
Sam Ruby wanted to know about possible threading issues. Leo requested
that they let the sleeping giant lie for a while lon
y put
some methods into the continuation to do this, but later though about
putting them into the interpreter instead. I like the interp idea.
<http://xrl.us/dvjc>
parrot -t memory leaks
Last week our fearless leader notice some not insignificant memory leaks
with parrot -t.
can take various compiler
arguments on the command line. What are you waiting for?
<http://xrl.us/dy5d>
Register Stomping
Matt Diephouse was having troubles with his newly updated forth
compiler. The verdict seems to be that he has uncovered a bug. To quote
Matt, "
for it. Will took a first pass at it.
<http://xrl.us/d6xj> -- original message
<http://www.parrotcode.org/examples/>
testj string_102 issues
Luke Palmer found a subte looking problem in string_102.pasm. Leo
couldn't reproduce it and suggested that it might be
Austin~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:15:54 -0500, Austin Hastings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin Hastings wrote:
>
> > Larry Wall wrote:
>
> And now, Piers is cackling madly at Matt: welcome to "perl6-hightraffic!"
>
> :-)
Even if he wasn't cackl
= ;
my @other = %hash;
(Those are written out for my own benefit; consider it a goodbye.)
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
. *shrug*
> And won't we just be doing:
>
> use CGI :standard;
>
> anyway?
Yeah, we will; I forgot. :-) I don't use Perl 6 very often (yet).
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
interpolate?
my $name = 'add';
my $code = q:c<«>[
sub «$name» ($left, $right) {
return $left + $right;
}
];
# prints "
# sub add ($left, $right) {
# return $left + $right;
# }
# "
Where you could whatever you wanted instead of «».
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
}
> ];
>
> After all, that's why we put \q interpolation into '' in the first place.
I missed that. Thanks.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
orth. I'm aware of how ridiculous many
of the things we (that includes me) say are, but perhaps I've said
something useful.
Hoping I haven't removed all doubt of my foolishness,
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:59:24 -0700, David Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Diephouse) wrote:
> >Supposing
> >class Filehandle does Iterate; # Iterate or Iterator?
> >we have an easy way to cr
given me another space to abuse. You
should listen to "Soul Coughing". If you would like to join in the fun
of abusing p6c, you should submit tests. Nothing is more abusive then
stress testing ;-)
Parrot
Tuning and Monitoring
Matt S asked how much support for tuni
quot;,
> $last, $first
> );
> }
>
> ...
> }
for @byid -> $patient { ... }
for %byname.kv -> $key, $value { ... }
???
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-06 through 2004-12-20
All~
The observant among you might notice that I missed last week's summary.
With the hubbub and confusion of the holidays, I blame ninjas, in
particular Ryu Hyabusa. Given that Christmas is next weekend and New
Years is the week
leanup
chromatic applied his previously threatened patch with a polite thanks
to himself.
<http://xrl.us/ekky>
reading past EOF in PIR
Matt Diephouse noted that the error from reading past the EOF in PIR was
not really informative. Patches welcome.
<http://xrl.us/ek
Austin~
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:20:25 -0500, Austin Hastings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> >Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
> >
> >
> >
>
> s/conses/consensus/g ?
Indeed. Let this be a lesson to anyone who wo
ced the powerful Parrot Syntax Engine. Leo
asked a few questions to which Henrik provided answers. All in all, it
looks really cool and makes me a little jealous that I did not develop
the Tomita algorithm first.
<http://xrl.us/eovf>
s/libnci.so/libnci_test.so/g
Bernhard Sc
;http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/rej/gc.html> -- the page
argv[0]
Will wants to get at the moral equivalent of argv[0].
<http://xrl.us/er3q>
proposed VTABLE changes for method lookup
Leo suggested a VTABLE change to facilitate MMD and method lookup.
Suggestions a
Leo~
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:26:07 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ cc'ed p6l ]
>
> Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Leo~
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:02:26 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
>
Leo~
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:01:42 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo~
>
> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:26:07 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> [
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
